TABLE 1.
Gene | Reference(s) (yr) | Population | Sample size | Variant(s)a | Phenotype | OR (95% CI), rel. risk, or χ2 value | P valueb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFB (B factor, Bf) | 114 (1980) | Thailand (Chinese) | 24 controls, 38 leprosy | Bf S allele | NE: lep | ||
Thailand (Thai) | 184 controls, 198 leprosy | Bf S allele | NE: lep | ||||
69 (1993) | Brazil | 172 controls, 109 leprosy (73 LL [46 with ENL], 36 non-TL) | Bf F allele (“Bf-F1”) | S: ENL | ND | <0.03 | |
C2 | 114 (1980) | Thailand Chinese | 24 controls, 38 leprosy | C2 C allele | NE: lep | ||
Thailand (Thai) | 184 controls, 198 leprosy | C2 C allele | NE: lep | ||||
C3 | 83 (1972) | Angola | 439 controls, 468 leprosy (97 LL, 180 TL, 191 IL) | S (major allele) vs F (minor allele) | NE: lep or lep type | ||
15 (1973) | Angola | 439 controls, 470 leprosy (97 LL, 182 TL, 191 IL) | S (major allele) vs F (minor allele) | NE: lep or lep type | |||
4 (1974) | Ethiopia and Mali | 66 controls, 152 leprosy | S (major allele) vs F (minor allele) | S: lep | [OR, 2.33 (0.19-0.98) (dom)] | [0.041] | |
[OR, 2.43 (0.17-0.98) (het)] | [0.041] | ||||||
294 (1975) | Ethiopia | 55 related controls, 91 leprosy | S (major allele) vs F (minor allele) | NE: lep | |||
C4A | 114 (1980) | Thai and Chinese individuals combined | 123 controls, 201 leprosy (27 TT, 103 BL, 71 LL) | C4A F1 allele (“functionally inactive”) | S: con vs. TT vs BB vs LL (4 × 2 chi square) | χ2 = 13.7 (ND) | <0.01 |
S: LL vs con | χ2 = 12.6 (ND) | <0.001 | |||||
C4B | 69 (1993) | Brazil | 172 controls, 109 leprosy (36 non-LL, 73 LL [46 ENL, 27 no ENL]) | C4B*Q0 absent allele | S: lep vs con | ND | 4.4 × 10−5 |
S: ENL vs no ENL | Rel. risk = 5.3 | [0.017] | |||||
S: ENL | ND | 3.6 × 10−7 | |||||
C4B*1 | S: ENL | ND | 3.9 × 10−3 | ||||
CR1 | 93 (2004) | Malawi | 166-252 controls, 186-399 leprosy (>90% PB) | G3093T | NE: lep | ||
A4795G “McCoy” | R: lep | OR, 0.3 (0.1-0.8) (rec) | 0.02 | ||||
G4828A “Swain-Langley” | NE: lep | ||||||
A4870G | NE: lep | ||||||
C5507G | NE: lep | ||||||
DEFB1 (β-defensin 1) | 230 (2009) | Mexico | 151 controls, 75 leprosy | G668C | S: lep | OR, 2.42 (1.37-4.28) (dom) | 0.009 |
(46 LL) | S: LL vs con | OR, 3.06 (1.47-6.04) (dom) | 0.024 | ||||
A692G | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
A1836G | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
Haplotype (668/692/1836) CGA | S: LL | 2.25 (1.23-4.03) | 0.009 | ||||
FCN2 | 70 (2009) | Brazil, mixed ethnicity | 210 controls, 158 leprosy (92 LL, 14 TT, 22 BL, 27 IL) | 20 SNPs | NE: lep | ||
Haplotype AGA (−986/−602/−4) | R: lep | OR, 0.13 (0.03-0.43) | <0.013 | ||||
Haplotype AGAG (−986/−602/−4/+6424) | R: lep | OR, 0.10 (0.11-0.43) | <0.011 | ||||
IFNG | 248 (2003) | Brazil | 98 controls, 96 leprosy (10 TT, 59 BL, 27 LL) | Intron 1 CA repeat (short [fewer than 122 bp]→long [122-126 bp]) | S: lep | [OR, 2.62 (1.29-5.32)] | 0.01 |
93 (2004) | Malawi | 236 controls, 402 cases | Intron 1 T874A | NE: lep | |||
IL10 | 262 (2002) | Brazil | 62 controls, 202 leprosy (143 MB, 59 PB) | C−819T | S: PB vs MB | OR, 2.28 (1.1-4.5) (allele) | <0.01 |
S: PB vs con | OR, ↑ [ND] (allele) | <0.05 | |||||
S: lep | OR, 2.64 (0.93-8.04) (rec) | 0.04 | |||||
C−592A | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
206 (2004) | Brazil | 283 controls, 297 leprosy (131 PB, 166 MB) | C−819T | NE: lep or lep type | |||
A−1082G | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
C−2763A | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
G−2849A | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
T−3575A | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
Haplotype −3575A/−2849G/−2763C | R: lep | OR, 0.35 (0.13-0.91) | 0.005 | ||||
R: lep vs PB vs MB | OR, 0.32 (0.12-0.83) (ordinal trait) | 0.006 | |||||
Haplotype −3575T/−2849A/−2763C | S: lep | OR, 2.37 (1.04-5.39) | 0.027 | ||||
93 (2004) | Malawi | 191-215 controls, 349-362 leprosy (>90% PB) | C−819T | NE: lep | |||
C−592A | NE: lep | ||||||
A−1082G | NE: lep | ||||||
185 (2005) | India | 266 controls, 282 leprosy (144 MB, 142 PB) | C−819T | S: lep | OR, ↑ (ND) (allele) | “Significant” [ND] | |
S: lep | OR, 2.50 (1.49-4.00) (rec) | <0.001 | |||||
S: MB vs con | OR, 2.63 (1.51-4.76) (rec) | 0.001 | |||||
S: PB vs con | OR, 2.32 (1.29-4.16) (rec) | 0.005 | |||||
C−592A | S: lep | OR, ↑ [ND] (allele) | “Significant” [ND] | ||||
S: lep | OR, 2.43 (1.47-4.00) (rec) | <0.001 | |||||
S: MB vs con | OR, 2.56 (1.44-4.54) (rec) | 0.001 | |||||
S: PB vs con | OR, 2.32 (1.29-4.16) (rec) | 0.005 | |||||
G−1082A | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
C−2763A | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
G−2849A | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
T−3575A | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
Haplotype −3575T/−2849G/−2763C/−1082A/−819C/−592C | R: lep | OR, 0.58 (0.37-0.89) | 0.01 | ||||
Haplotype −3575T/−2849G/−2763C/−1082A/−819T/−592A | S: MB > PB > con; NE: lep | ND (ordinal trait) | 0.0002 | ||||
Diplotype of proximal promoter SNPs G−1082A, C−819T, and C−592A (ACC/ACC) | R: lep | [OR, 0.35 (0.19-0.63)] | 0.001 | ||||
R: MB vs con | [OR, 0.26 (0.11-0.60)] | 0.002 | |||||
R: PB vs con | [OR, 0.44 (0.22-0.88)] | 0.02 | |||||
Diplotype of proximal promoter SNPs, G−1082A, C−819T, and C−592A (ATA/ATA) | S: lep | [OR, 1.82 (1.05-3.23)] | 0.03 | ||||
S: MB vs con | [OR, 1.96 (1.03-3.85)] | 0.04 | |||||
225 (2008) | Brazil | 368-380 controls, 321-369 leprosy | C−819T | S: lep | OR, 1.60 (ND) (TT vs CC) | 0.05 | |
OR, 1.44 (ND) (dom) | 0.026 | ||||||
A−1082G | ND (not in HWE) | ||||||
C−2763A | NE: lep | ||||||
G−2849A | NE: lep | ||||||
T−3575A | NE: lep | ||||||
Haplotype −3575T/−2849G/−2763C/−819T | S: lep | OR, 1.35 (ND) | 0.03 | ||||
225 (2008) | Meta-analysise | 1,347 controls, 1,355 leprosy | C−819T | S: lep | OR, 1.30 (1.13-1.49) (allele) | 0.0003 | |
S: lep | OR, 1.28 (1.03-1.60) (dom) | 0.0237 | |||||
S: lep | OR, 1.66 (1.29-2.15) (rec) | 0.0001 | |||||
96 (2009) | Brazil | 240 controls, 156 leprosy | Diplotype G−1082A/C−819T/ C−592C | NE: lep | |||
IL12B (IL-12p40) | 207 (2007) | India | 89 controls, 80 leprosy | 3′ UTR TaqI site SNP (genotype 2.2 vs 1.1 or 1.2) | R: lep | [OR, 0.13 (0.03-0.58) (rec)] | 0.002 |
NE: lep type | |||||||
14 (2008) | Mexico | 51 controls, 44 LL | 3′ UTR 1188 A/C (TaqI site) | S: lep | [OR, 7.2 (2.38-21.61) (rec)] | <0.05 | |
IL12RB2 | 218 (2005) | Japan | 68 controls, 176 leprosy (130 LL, 46 TL) | A−1035G | S: LL vs TL | OR, 3.97 (ND) (allele) | <0.001 |
A−1023G | S: LL vs TL | OR, 2.95 (ND) (allele) | <0.01 | ||||
−650delG | S: LL vs TL | OR, 3.74 (ND) (allele) | <0.001 | ||||
A−464G | S: LL vs TL | OR, 3.64 (ND) (allele) | <0.01 | ||||
Haplotype −1035A/−1023A/−650G/ −464A | R: LL vs TL | ND | 0.0002 | ||||
R: LL vs con | ND | 0.039 | |||||
4 other haplotypes tested | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
KIR | 97 (2008) | Brazil | 289 controls, 165 leprosy (65 LL, 49 BB, 42 TT) | KIR2DL1-5 | NE: lep or lep type | ||
KIR3DL1-3 | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
KIR2DS3 | NE: lep type | ||||||
S: TT vs LL | 2.72 (1.12-6.58) | 0.04 | |||||
KIR2DS1-2, KIR2DS4-5 | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
KIR2DP1 | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
KIR3DP1 | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
LAMA2 (laminin α-2) | 334 (2002) | Indonesia | 58 controls, 53 leprosy (26 TL, 27 LL) | T7809C | S: TL vs LL | χ2 = 8.07 (genotype) | <0.025 |
OR, 6.73 (1.94-23.36) (TC vs. TT) | <0.005 | ||||||
LTA (lymphotoxin-α) | 93 (2004) | Malawi | 333 controls, 184 leprosy (85% PB) | 5′ UTR microsatellite (AC/GT)n at −3.5-kb 105-bp allele | S: lep | OR, 1.6 (1.1-2.4) | 0.03 |
5′ UTR microsatellite (AC/GT)n at −3.5-kb 101-bp allele | S: MB vs con | χ2 = 11.7 (ND) | 0.003 | ||||
8 (2007) | India | 371 controls, 364 leprosy | LTA−294 univariate analysis | S: lep | 1.78 (1.29-2.45) | 0.0004 | |
LTA−294 multivariate analysis | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA−293 | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA+10 | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA+80 (A allele) univariate analysis | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA+80 (A allele) multivariate analysis | S: lep | 1.60 (1.10-2.33) (dom) | 0.01 | ||||
LTA+80 (A allele) subgroup ages 16-25 yr | S: lep | 2.95 (1.32-6.58) (dom) | 0.006 | ||||
LTA+252 | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA+368 | NE: lep | ||||||
MCCD1 rs2259435 (A allele) univariate analysis | S: lep | 1.59 (1.24-2.04) | 0.0002 | ||||
MCCD1 rs2259435 (A allele) multivariate analysis | S: lep | 1.82 (1.38-2.41) | 0.0004 | ||||
Vietnamd | 194 simplex leprosy families | LTA−294 | NE: lep | ||||
LTA−293 univariate analysis | S: lep | 1.97 (1.30-2.99) | 0.0009 | ||||
LTA−293 multivariate analysis | S: lep | 1.97 (1.30-2.99) | 0.0009 | ||||
LTA+10 | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA+80 univariate analysis | S: lep | 1.74 (1.16-2.60) | 0.007 | ||||
LTA+252 | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA+368 univariate analysis | S: lep | 1.63 (1.09-2.43) | 0.02 | ||||
Brazil | 192 controls, 209 leprosy | LTA−294 | NE: lep | ||||
LTA−293 | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA+10 | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA+80 (A allele) | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA+80 (A allele) subgroup ages 16-25 yr | Trend: lep | 2.76 (0.74-10.32) | NS [ND] | ||||
LTA+252 | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA+368 | NE: lep | ||||||
LTA4H | 304 (2010) | Nepal | 899 leprosy (443 MB without ENL, 335 PB) | rs1978331 T/C | R: MB vs PB | OR, 0.62 (0.46-0.82) (het) | 0.001 |
rs2660898 T/G | R: MB vs PB | OR, 0.70 (0.52-0.95) (het) | 0.021 | ||||
MBL2 | 93 (2004) | Malawi | 261 controls, 231 leprosy | G239A | NE: lep | ||
71 (2007) | Brazil | 214 controls, 264 leprosy (150 LL, 36 TL, 37 BL, 17 IL) | Haplotype LYPA (−550L/221Y/+4P/exon 1 A) | S: lep | OR, 2.25 (1.31-3.88) | 0.020 | |
S: LL vs con | OR, 2.22 (1.21-4.05) | 0.060 | |||||
S: BL vs con | OR, 2.98 (1.29-6.87) | 0.060 | |||||
“Low”-MBL-producing genotypes | R: LL vs TL | OR, 0.31 (0.13-0.71) | 0.012 | ||||
MICA/MICB | 331 (1999) | China | 112 controls, 69 leprosy | MICA-A5 | R: lep | Rel. risk, 0.62 (allele) | 0.06 |
R: MB vs con | Rel. risk, 0.56 (allele) | <0.05 | |||||
Haplotype MICA-A5 with HLA-B46 | R: lep | Rel. risk, 0.37 | <0.03 | ||||
R: MB vs con | Rel. risk, 0.22 | <0.01 | |||||
MRC1 | 12 (2010) | Vietnamd | 490 simplex families (53% MB) + 90 multiplex families (55% MB) for a total of 704 leprosy patients (325 PB, 374 MB) | rs1926736 G/A A allele (396S) | R: lep | OR: 0.76 (0.60-0.96) (best dom) | 0.035 |
R: MB | OR: 0.71 (0.51-0.99) (best dom) | 0.034 | |||||
Brazil | 384 leprosy (∼162 MB, ∼167 PB), 399 controls, | rs1926736 A/G G allele (396G) | S: lep | OR, 1.34 (1.06-1.70) (additive) | 0.016 | ||
S: MB | OR, 1.42 (1.05-1.93) (additive) | 0.023 | |||||
rs2437257 C/G (407L) | NE: lep | ||||||
R: MB | OR, 0.63 (0.41-0.97) (dom) | 0.04 | |||||
Haplotype G396-F407 | S: lep | OR, 1.41 (1.13-1.76) | 0.003 | ||||
S: MB | OR, 1.61 (1.21-2.14) | 0.001 | |||||
Haplotype S396-F407 | R: lep | OR, 0.75 (0.59-0.95) | 0.019 | ||||
R: MB | OR, 0.68 (0.50-0.93) | 0.015 | |||||
NOD2 | 93 (2004) | Malawi | ND | C802T | Not present in population | ||
C2104T | |||||||
G2722C | |||||||
3020insC 1007fs | |||||||
27 (2010) | Nepal | 101 controls, 933 leprosy | rs12448797 T/C (C allele) | S: lep | OR, 2.18 (1.06-5.23) (allele) | 0.031 | |
OR, 2.47 (1.12-6.44) (dom) | 0.021 | ||||||
rs2287195 A/G (G allele) | S: lep | OR, 1.51 (1.08-2.14) (allele) | 0.013 | ||||
OR, 1.85 (1.19-2.88) (dom) | 0.004 | ||||||
rs8044354 A/G (G allele) | S: lep | OR, 1.53 (1.11-2.10) (allele) | 0.006 | ||||
OR, 2.07 (1.33-3.22) (dom) | 0.0006 | ||||||
rs13339578 G/A (A allele) | S: lep | OR, 1.71 (1.10-2.68) (dom) | 0.012 | ||||
rs4785225 C/G (G allele) | S: lep | OR, 1.67 (1.07-2.60) (dom) | 0.017 | ||||
rs751271 A/C (C allele) | S: lep | OR, 1.65 (1.07-2.58) (dom) | 0.016 | ||||
rs1477176 T/C (C allele) | R: lep | OR, 0.44 (0.28-0.71) (allele) | <0.001 | ||||
OR, 0.43 (0.26-0.73) (dom) | 0.0005 | ||||||
124 ENL | rs2287195 A/G (G Allele) | S: ENL vs no ENL | OR, 1.82 (1.12-3.00) (dom) | 0.011 | |||
428 no ENL | rs8044354 A/G (G Allele) | S: ENL vs no ENL | OR, 1.34 (0.99-1.82) (allele) | 0.046 | |||
OR, 2.17 (1.26-3.88) (dom) | 0.003 | ||||||
rs7194886 C/T (T allele) | S: ENL vs no ENL | OR, 1.66 (1.07-2.57) (dom) | 0.016 | ||||
rs6500328 A/G (G allele) | S: ENL vs no ENL | OR, 1.69 (1.09-2.62) (dom) | 0.012 | ||||
rs17312836 A/C (C allele) | S: ENL vs no ENL | OR, 1.43 (1.00-2.04) (allele) | 0.039 | ||||
OR, 1.70 (1.09-2.64) (dom) | 0.013 | ||||||
rs1861759 A/C (C allele) | S: ENL vs no ENL | OR, 1.42 (1.00-2.01) (allele) | 0.037 | ||||
OR, 1.78 (1.15-2.73) (dom) | 0.006 | ||||||
rs1861758 C/T (T allele) | S: ENL vs no ENL | OR, 1.41 (0.99-1.99) (allele) | 0.047 | ||||
OR, 1.69 (1.09-2.63) (dom) | 0.014 | ||||||
240 RR | rs2287195 A/G (G allele) | R: RR vs no RR | OR, 0.74 (0.58-0.95) (allele) | 0.013 | |||
693 no RR | OR, 0.69 (0.50-0.96) (dom) | 0.023 | |||||
rs8044354 A/G (G allele) | R: RR vs no RR | OR, 0.74 (0.59-0.92) (allele) | 0.005 | ||||
OR, 0.69 (0.49-0.96) (dom) | 0.021 | ||||||
rs8043770 C/G (G allele) | R: RR vs no RR | OR, 0.73 (0.57-0.94) (allele) | 0.012 | ||||
OR, 0.67 (0.49-0.92) (dom) | 0.010 | ||||||
rs7194886 C/T (T allele) | R: RR vs no RR | OR, 0.74 (0.55-0.98) (allele) | 0.032 | ||||
OR, 0.69 (0.49-0.96) (dom) | 0.023 | ||||||
rs1861759 A/C (C allele) | R: RR vs no RR | OR, 0.75 (0.57-0.99) (allele) | 0.041 | ||||
OR, 0.69 (0.49-0.95) (dom) | 0.019 | ||||||
rs4785225 C/G (G allele) | R: RR vs no RR | OR, 0.71 (0.52-0.97) (dom) | 0.027 | ||||
rs751271 A/C (C allele) | R: RR vs no RR | OR, 0.73 (0.53-0.99) (dom) | 0.038 | ||||
PARK2/PACRG | 196 (2004) | Brazil | 388 controls, 587 leprosy (38% PB, 62% MB) | rs2803104 (A allele) | NE: lep | ||
10 kb_target_5_2 (T allele) | S: lep | ND | 0.019 | ||||
PARK2_e01(−697) (G allele) | S: lep | ND | 0.001 | ||||
PARK2_e01(−2599) (T allele) | S: lep | ND | 0.003 | ||||
PARK2_e01(−3024) (C allele) | NE: lep | ||||||
PARK2_e01(−3800) (G allele) | S: lep | ND | 0.009 | ||||
28 kb_target_2_1 (T allele) | NE: lep | ||||||
28 kb_target_4_1 (A allele) | S: lep | ND | 0.003 | ||||
rs1514343 (T allele) | S: lep | ND | 0.045 | ||||
rs1333955 (C allele) | S: lep | ND | 0.034 | ||||
rs1040079 (C allele) | S: lep | ND | 0.001 | ||||
40 kb_target_8_F60 (A allele) | S: lep | ND | 0.032 | ||||
40 kb_target_8_F706 (G allele) | NE: lep | ||||||
184 (2006) | India | 350 controls, 286 leprosy (144 MB, 142 PB) | PARK2_e01(−2599) | NE: lep or lep type | |||
PARK2_e01(−697) | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
28 kb_target_2_1 | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
10 kb_target_5_2 | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
rs1040079 | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
SLC11A1 (NRAMP) | 256 (1999) | India | 165 controls, 227 leprosy (105 TL, 122 LL) | 5′ MS [(GT)n or (CA)n] | NE: lep or lep type | ||
3′ UTR TGTG del/ins | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
(469 + 14 G/C) intron 4 SNP | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
Exon 2 polymorphism | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
191 (2001) | Mali | 201 controls, 273 leprosy (92 PB, 181 MB) | 3′ UTR TGTG deletion | S: MB vs PB (het vs del/del) | OR, 5.79 (1.46-24.61) | 0.003 | |
89 (2004) | Brazil | 61 controls (30 positive for MR, 24 negative for MR), 90 leprosy (45 MB, 45 PB, 18 positive for MR, 64 negative for MR) | Alleles of 5′ promoter microsatellite [(GT)n or (CA)n] polymorphisms | NE: lep, lep type, MR | |||
321 (2007) | Thailand | 140 controls, 37 leprosy (13 PB, 24 MB) | (469 + 14 G/C) intron 4 SNP | NE: lep or lep type | |||
D543N SNP | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
3′ UTR TGTG del/ins | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
93 (2004) | Malawi | 283-429 controls, 244-258 leprosy (>90% PB) | Promoter microsatellite(GT)n genotypes 199/201, 199/199, 201/201 | NE: lep | |||
Other promoter microsatellite(GT)n genotypes | NE: lep | ||||||
Exon 2, 9-bp del | NE: lep | ||||||
3′ UTR TGTG del/ins | NE: lep | ||||||
3′ UTR CAAA del/ins | NE: lep | ||||||
TLR1 | 149 (2007) | Turkey | 90 controls, 57 leprosy | T1805G G allele (602S) | R: lep | OR, 0.48 (0.29-0.80) | 0.004 |
T1805G GG genotype (602SS) | R: lep | ND | 0.02 | ||||
198 (2008) | Nepal | 933 leprosy (311 TL, 490 LL) | T1805G G allele (602S) | NE: lep | |||
NE: TL vs LL | |||||||
R: RR | OR, 0.51 (0.29-0.87) (allele) | 0.01 | |||||
271 (2009) | Bangladesh | 543 controls, 842 leprosy (702 PB, 140 MB) | T1805G G allele (602S) | NE: lep | |||
A743G GG genotype (248SS) | S: lep | OR, 1.34 (1.06-1.70) (rec) | [0.016] | ||||
A743G G allele (248S) | R: ENL | OR, 0.40 (0.16-0.99) (allele) | [0.04] | ||||
A743G GG genotype (248SS) | Trend: RR | OR, 1.57 (0.97-2.55) (rec) | NS | ||||
TLR2 | 93 (2004) | Malawi | 379 controls, 210 cases (26 MB, 184 PB) | Intron 2 microsatellites 216 bp, 222 bp, 224 bp, 226 bp | NE: lep | ||
Intron 2 microsatellite 224 bp | MB vs PB | χ2= 6.3 (ND) | 0.042 | ||||
35 (2008) | Ethiopia | 197 controls, 441 leprosy (298 LL, 138 TL, 5 uncharacterized, 66 RR, 150 no RR) | Microsatellite (280 bp) | S: RR | OR, 5.83 (1.98-17.15) (rec) | 0.001 | |
Microsatellite (288 bp) | R: LL vs. TL | OR, 0.49 (0.27-0.90) (dom) | 0.02 | ||||
Microsatellite (290 bp) | R: lep | OR, 0.62 (0.41-0.93) (additive) | 0.02 | ||||
Other microsatellites | NE: lep, lep type, RR | ||||||
C597T (N199N) | R: RR | OR, 0.34 (0.17-0.68) (dom) | 0.002 | ||||
T1350C (S450S) | NE: lep, lep type, RR | ||||||
“280 C-T haplotype” (280 bp, 297C, 1350T) | S: RR | OR, 6.39 (2.14-19.07) (rec) | 0.001 | ||||
TLR4 | 36 (2009) | Ethiopia | 197 controls, 441 leprosy (298 lepromatous [199 BL, 81 LL, 18 MB], 138 tuberculoid [128 BT, 3 TT, 7 PB], 5 uncharacterized, 133 neuritis, 66 RR, 17 ENL) | G896A | R: lep | OR, 0.34 (0.20-0.57) (additive) | <0.001 |
T1196C | R: lep | OR, 0.15 (0.06-0.39) (dom) | <0.001 | ||||
G1530T | R: lep | OR, 0.38 (0.14-1.01) (dom) | 0.05 | ||||
A1976G | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
Haplotype 896G/1196T/1530G/1976A | R: lep | OR, 0.12 (0.05-0.34) | <0.001 | ||||
Haplotype 896G/1196C/1530T/1976A | R: lep | OR, 0.23 (0.08-0.69) | 0.008 | ||||
93 (2004) | Malawi | 288 controls, 235 leprosy | G896A | NE: lep | |||
TNF | 257 (1997) | India | 160 controls, 228 leprosy (121 LL, 107 TT) | G−308A | S: LL vs con | Rel. risk, 2.5 (1.1-6.5) (allele) | 0.03 |
261, 262 (2000 and 2002, respectively) | Brazil | 92 controls, 300 leprosy (MB [70 LL, 85 BL, 55 BB], PB [63 BT, 2 TT], 10 indeterminant, 15 pure neuritis) | G−308A | R: lep | [OR, 0.63 (0.39-1.0) (allele)] | <0.05 | |
R: MB vs con | [OR, 0.53 (0.30-0.91) (allele)] | <0.01 | |||||
S: PB vs MB | OR, 1.65 (0.9-2.9) (allele) | <0.05 | |||||
G−238A | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
93 (2004) | Malawi | 258-283 controls, 216-243 leprosy (>90% PB) | G−238A | NE: lep | |||
G−308A | NE: lep | ||||||
G−376A | NE: lep | ||||||
C−863A | NE: lep | ||||||
321 (2007) | Thailand | 140 controls, 37 leprosy (13 PB, 24 MB) | G−308A | S: MB vs con (het) | OR, 2.69 (ND) | 0.04 | |
G−238A | NE: lep or lep type | ||||||
VDR | 256 (1999) | India | 166 controls, 231 leprosy (107 TL, 124 LL) | TaqI T→C (“T”→“t”) | S: TL vs con | OR, 3.22 (1.47-7.13) (rec) | 0.001 |
R: LL vs con | [OR, 0.60 (0.37-0.96) (dom)] | [0.03] | |||||
[OR, 0.54 (0.33-0.86) (het)] | [0.01] | ||||||
93 (2004) | Malawi | 328-398 controls, 168-247 leprosy (>90% PB) | TaqI T→C (“T”→“t”) | Controls violate HWE | |||
ApaI G→T (“a”→“A”) | NE: lep | ||||||
BsmI C→T (“b”→“B”) | NE: lep | ||||||
113 (2006) | Brazil | 68 controls, 102 leprosy (55 PB, 47 MB) | TaqI T→C (“T”→“t”) genotypes alone | NE: lep or lep type | |||
85 (2009) | Mexico | 144 controls, 71 LL | TaqI T→C (“T”→“t”) | R: lep (LL) | OR, 0.55 (0.31-0.98) (dom) | 0.04 | |
[OR, 0.50 (0.27-0.92) (het)] | [0.03] |
By convention, the variant SNP (a) is designated second (e.g., “A→a,” “A/a,” or “A[nucleotide position]a”).
When present, corrected P values are reported.
Abbreviations: con, controls, lep, leprosy (multiple forms or unspecified forms); MB, multibacillary; PB, paucibacillary; BL, borderline (depending on the study, this may indicate BB, BL, BT, or any combination of these); IL, indeterminate leprosy; LL, lepromatous leprosy (depending on study, this may indicate LL only or LL plus BL or plus BB); TL, tuberculoid leprosy (depending on the study, this may indicate TT or TT plus BT); ENL, erythema nodosum leprosum; RR, reversal reaction; MR, Mitsuda reaction; S, susceptible; R, resistant; dom, dominant model of genetic analysis (compares aa plus Aa versus AA); rec, recessive genetic model (compares aa versus AA plus Aa); het, heterozygotes or heterozygous model of analysis (Aa versus AA plus aa); HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; del, deletion; ins, insertion; ND, no data (data not shown or not available); NE, no effect (no association found); NE: lep or lep type, phenotypes investigated and relevant variant not associated with either phenotype (i.e., not with leprosy overall or a specific type of leprosy, such as MB, PB, TT, or LL); NS, not significant; rel risk, relative risk. Data in brackets indicate where P values, ORs, or 95% confidence intervals were calculated by these reviewers or where ORs have been inverted to simplify comparison of the same risk allele across different studies.
The Vietnamese component of this study was a family-based association study.