TABLE 3.
GT |
Bartonella species (% similarity)a |
Reactivity with the ITS probes |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
gltA | ITS | Pattern | Laneb | |
1 | B. vinsonii subsp. arupensis (93.5) | B. taylorii (98.9) | S-TAY | 1 |
2 | B. taylorii (94.2) | B. taylorii (97.8) | S-TAY + S-CE1MM3b | 41 |
3 | ND | B. taylorii (93.5) | S-TAY + S-CE1MM3b | NS |
4 | B. taylorii (94.6) | B. taylorii (97.8) | S-TAY+ S-MUS1+ S-CE1MM3b | 42 |
5 | ND | B. taylorii (98.4) | S-TAY+ S-MUS1+ S-CE1MM3b | NS |
6 | B. vinsonii subsp. arupensis (94.5) | B. taylorii (99.0) | S-CE1MM3b | 7 |
7 | B. vinsonii subsp. vinsonii (95.0) | B. taylorii (73.9) | S-TAY + S-TALP | 2 |
8 | B. vinsonii subsp. vinsonii (93.8) | B. taylorii (91.0) | S-TAY + S-MUS1 | 3 |
9 | B. vinsonii subsp. arupensis (91.9) | B. taylorii (90.2) | S-TAY + S-MUS2 | 4 |
10 | B. birtlesii (91.9) | B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii (67.9), B. cooperplainsense (67.0) | S-R24Sh | 19 |
11 | B. birtlesii (100.0) | ND | NAc | NA |
12 | B. grahamii (100.0) | B. grahamii (98.8) | S-GUIMM1 | 16 |
13 | B. tribocorum (95.8) | B. elizabethae (77.4), B. tribocorum (77.1) | S-CAT6 | 17 |
14 | ND | B. elizabethae (89.3), B. grahamii (89.3) | S-OR3MM1 | 8 |
15 | B. elizabethae (97.3) | B. elizabethae (89.6), B. grahamii (89.6) | S-OR3MM1 | NS |
16 | B. elizabethae (96.9) | B. elizabethae (85.3) | S-OR3MM1+S-R2Eb | 9 |
17 | B. elizabethae (96.9) | B. grahamii (91.9) | S-OR3MM3 | 10 |
18 | B. elizabethae (97.3) | B. elizabethae (95.0) | S-ELIZ+S-CAT9 | 11 |
19 | B. doshiae (96.2) | B. doshiae (89.6) | S-APO38 | 14 |
20 | B. rochalimae (95.8) | B. rochalimae (65.4) | S-APS48 | 18 |
21 | B. rochalimae (96.2) | B. rochalimae (71.5) | S-MUS3b | 5 |
22 | ND | B. tribocorum (73.5), B. rochalimae (73.0) | S-TOPO15b | 6 |
The highest percent similarity found with the indicated Bartonella species is indicated in parentheses. ND, not determined (a sequence could not be obtained).
The corresponding lane in Fig. 1A with an example of this hybridization pattern. NS, not shown.
NA, not applicable.