TABLE 4.
Method | Interpretative criteria | Sensitivity (%)b |
Specificity (%)b |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPM | MEM | ERT | DOR | IPM | MEM | ERT | DOR | ||
BMD | Original CLSI/FDA criteriac | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 92.0 | 89.6 | 83.1 | 83.7 |
Updated 2010 CLSI criteriad | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 86.6 | 86.6 | 76.3 | 85.1 | |
Etest | Original CLSI/FDA criteriac | 100 | 100 | 100 | 97.7 | 95.4 | 92.8 | 84.4 | 85.1 |
Updated 2010 CLSI criteriad | 80.8 | 91.3 | 97.7 | 95.5 | 88.8 | 85.8 | 77.4 | 88.8 | |
DD | Original CLSI/FDA criteriac | NA | 100 | 100 | 100 | NA | 87.3 | 82.4 | 84.4 |
Updated 2010 CLSI criteriad | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90.4 | 84.4 | 77.4 | 84.4 | |
MHT alonee | NA | 100 | 100 | NA | NA | 88.0 | 91.2 | NA | NA |
BMD, broth microdilution; MHT, modified Hodge test; DD, disk diffusion; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; ERT, ertapenem; DOR, doripenem.
Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN); specificity = TN/(TN+FP). TP, number of carbapenemase producers (n = 42); TN, number of non-carbapenemase producers (n = 103); TP, number of true positive results; TN, number of true negative results; FP, number of false-positive results; FN, number of false-negative results.
Based on original CLSI criteria for IPM, MEM, and ERT, with MHT performed with meropenem, and on FDA criteria for DOR (see Table 1).
Based on updated CLSI criteria (see Table 2).
Ability of MHT performed on all strains (n = 145), using IPM and MEM disks, to identify carbapenemase-producing isolates correctly.