Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 29;48(12):4417–4425. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02458-09

TABLE 4.

Statistical analysis of the different phenotypic tests used to differentiate carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates (n = 42) from non-carbapenemase producers (n = 103)a

Method Interpretative criteria Sensitivity (%)b
Specificity (%)b
IPM MEM ERT DOR IPM MEM ERT DOR
BMD Original CLSI/FDA criteriac 100 100 100 100 92.0 89.6 83.1 83.7
Updated 2010 CLSI criteriad 100 100 100 100 86.6 86.6 76.3 85.1
Etest Original CLSI/FDA criteriac 100 100 100 97.7 95.4 92.8 84.4 85.1
Updated 2010 CLSI criteriad 80.8 91.3 97.7 95.5 88.8 85.8 77.4 88.8
DD Original CLSI/FDA criteriac NA 100 100 100 NA 87.3 82.4 84.4
Updated 2010 CLSI criteriad 100 100 100 100 90.4 84.4 77.4 84.4
MHT alonee NA 100 100 NA NA 88.0 91.2 NA NA
a

BMD, broth microdilution; MHT, modified Hodge test; DD, disk diffusion; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; ERT, ertapenem; DOR, doripenem.

b

Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN); specificity = TN/(TN+FP). TP, number of carbapenemase producers (n = 42); TN, number of non-carbapenemase producers (n = 103); TP, number of true positive results; TN, number of true negative results; FP, number of false-positive results; FN, number of false-negative results.

c

Based on original CLSI criteria for IPM, MEM, and ERT, with MHT performed with meropenem, and on FDA criteria for DOR (see Table 1).

d

Based on updated CLSI criteria (see Table 2).

e

Ability of MHT performed on all strains (n = 145), using IPM and MEM disks, to identify carbapenemase-producing isolates correctly.