Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 23;103(12):1765–1772. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606008

Table 2. Influence of EGFR status (gene copy number) on subject response in KRAS wild-type MCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR mAb-based CT.

      PFS (months)
  OS (months)
  Responders Nonresponders  
Study N EGFR cutoff No 95% CI P-value No 95% CI P-value CR+PR SD+PD P-value
Moroni et al (2005) 20 ⩾3a         6 1 0.001
    <3         1 12  
Personeni et al (2008) 58 ⩾2.83a 5.5   0.25 10   0.037 17 10 0.007
    <2.83 4     8.3     8 23  
Laurent-Puig et al (2009) 116 ⩾2a 8.5 7–16 0.28 20 13–NA 0.018 12 5 0.015
    <2 7 5–8.5   14 11–17   29 50  
Scartozzi et al (2009) 44 ⩾2.6a 7.7   0.04 16   0.2 9 6 0.001
    <2.6 2.9     9.5     2 21  
    ⩾2.12b 6.4   0.02 10.6   0.95 10 18 0.04
    <2.12 3.1     10.3     1 15  
Tol et al (2010) 155 ⩾3a 9.5 6.4–12.3 0.19 21.9 13.4–27.1 0.65  
    <3 10.4 8.6–12.2   22 19.2–25.4    

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CISH=chromogenic in situ hybridisation; CR=complete response; CT=chemotherapy; EGFR=epidermal growth factor receptor; FISH=fluorescence in situ hybridisation; mAb=monoclonal antibody; MCRC=metastatic colorectal cancer; NA=not assessable; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; PR=partial response; PD=progressive disease; SD=stable disease.

a

FISH.

b

CISH.