Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 20;588(Pt 22):4549–4562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.191510

Figure 5. Tetanic force recovery was greater following FAT2 than following FAT1 in the presence of 10 μm glibenclamide, but not in control conditions.

Figure 5

The fatigue protocols were as illustrated in Fig. 2A. FAT1 and FAT2 were elicited under control conditions (A) or in the presence of glibenclamide (B). Tetanic force was expressed as a percentage of the pre-FAT1 force. Vertical bars represent the s.e.m. of 5 FDB bundles. *Unstimulated force significantly different from FAT1, ANOVA and LSD, P < 0.05.