Table 4.
Data set | Published motif | Motif pattern discovered | Motif recognition program | ℓ | d | Time (CPU sec.) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
hm01 | gggaggctgaggcatgag | cggaggcctaagcctcag | GLAM [22] | 18 | 8 | 42.1 |
hm03 | Cagccaggctgcagtgctg | Catccatacagaa | GLAM [22] | 13 | 6 | 12.3 |
hm04 | gcgatgtgtaatagtcgc | gacatgtgtaaaaga | MEME [11] | 15 | 9 | 54.2 |
hm08 | ggagaaattctaa | aTGACgTC | Weeder [14] | 13 | 6 | 4.34 |
hm20 | ctgTAatc | gagTAaac | MITRA [6] | 8 | 3 | 6.7 |
hm26 | GCCGGC | GCCGGC | MITRA [6] | 6 | 0 | 3.44 |
Data collected from TRANSFAC and the published motifs are found by the assessment of Tompa et. al. [2] of differing motif tools. For each set of data, we determined motifs of the same length using sMCL-WMR. The number of strings ranges from 8 to 34.