Skip to main content
. 2001 Mar 24;322(7288):701. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7288.701

Table 3.

Cost effectiveness ratios and sensitivity analysis: incremental cost of exercise programme per fall event prevented in exercise centres compared with control centres

Cost scenario $NZ
Cost per fall prevented:
 Total cost of programme 1519
 125th centile total cost of programme 1899
 75th centile total cost of programme 1139
 Training, supervision in same centre 1426
 125th centile cost of home visits 1757
 × 4 ankle cuff weights 1856
 No extra overhead costs 1247
Adjusted cost per fall prevented*:
 Total cost of programme 1734
 125th centile total cost of programme 2167
 75th centile total cost of programme 1300
 Training, supervision in same centre 1627
 125th centile cost of home visits 2005
 × 4 ankle cuff weights 2117
 No extra overhead costs 1423
Cost per injurious fall prevented:
 Total cost of programme 3404
 125th centile total cost of programme 4255
 75th centile total cost of programme 2553
 Training, supervision in same centre 3196
 125th centile cost of home visits 3937
 × 4 ankle cuff weights 4158
 No extra overhead costs 2794
Adjusted cost per injurious fall prevented*:
 Total cost of programme 3846
 125th centile total cost of programme 4808
 75th centile total cost of programme 2885
 Training, supervision in same centre 3611
 125th centile cost of home visits 4448
 × 4 ankle cuff weights 4698
 No extra overhead costs 3157

Average exchange rate in 1998, $NZ1.00=32p. 

*

Calculated using fall events per 100 person years to adjust for variable follow up times for individuals in trial.