Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 6;107(51):22356–22359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016823108

Table 1.

Similarities and differences between REMEMBER and IMAGERY of the past

Contrast Brain region Voxels (k) Z x-talai y-talai z-talai
REMEMBER > PRESENT Parietal cortex_L 758 4.54 −38 −72 46
Precuneus_R 6,776 3.04 6 −53 67
Precuneus_L 3.02 −12 −50 43
Frontal_Mid_L 809 4.06 −34 16 42
Frontal_Sup_R 190 3.96 22 27 39
Cerebellum 372 3.55 14 −80 −16
Midcingulum 214 3.41 −2 −6 30
Cerebellum_R 391 3.27 12 −45 −40
Cerebellum_L 2.58 −18 −41 −40
Temporal cortex_L 339 3.23 −50 −26 −7
Frontal_Mid_Orb_L 130 3.14 −38 58 −5
Cerebellum 312 3.12 32 −83 −26
Frontal_Sup_Medial_L 167 3.11 −10 37 37
PAST > PRESENT Parietal cortex_L 119 3.45 −34 −71 50
Cerebellum 169 3.31 10 −80 −16
REMEMBER > PAST Paracentral_Lobule_R 309 4.41 12 −16 73
Frontal_Mid_R 118 4.75 24 29 39
Cingulum_Mid_L 1,900 4.20 −8 −37 42
Cuneus_L 158 3.64 −8 −59 25
Angular_L 61 3.51 −40 −70 42
PAST > REMEMBER

Relative to IMAGERY of the PRESENT, both the REMEMBER and PAST conditions engaged the left parietal cortex and the cerebellum. In addition, REMEMBER recruited an extensive set of regions in frontal, parietal, and temporal cortices (P < 0.001, uncorrected; k > 50).