Table 4.

Primary and secondary outcomes for condom design interventions

Study	Type of intervention	Outcome	OR
			(95% CI)
High quality trials
Golombok103	Thicker vs thinner condom	Condom failure before/during sex	OR 1.06 (0.79 to 1.41)
Golombok103	Thicker vs thinner condom	Condom failure during sex	OR 1.01 (0.70 to 1.47)
Golombok103	Thicker vs thinner condom	Condom breakage before or during sex	OR 1.02 (0.66 to 1.58)
Golombok103	Thicker vs thinner condom	Condom breakage during sex (over specified time period)	OR 0.94 (0.49 to 1.80)
Golombok103	Thicker vs thinner condom	Full slippage during sex	OR 1.01 (0.70 to 1.47)
Golombok103	Thicker vs thinner condom	Partial slippage during sex	OR 1.06 (0.64 to 1.76)
Other trials
Primary outcomes
Steiner104	Choice of condoms	Any STI	OR 1.31 (0.80 to 2.15)
Secondary condom use outcomes
Joanis (C Joanis, M Weaver, C Toroitich-Ruto, et al, unpublished)	Choice of condoms	Proportion of sex protected	SMD −0.135 (−0.250 to −0.020)
Steiner104	Choice of condom	Proportion of sex protected	SMD 0.110 (−0.082 to 0.303)
Benton105	Swiss quality seal: Australian standard condom	Condom breakage during sex	OR 0.86 (0.49 to 1.49)
Benton105	Swiss quality seal: Australian standard condom	Condom breakage during vaginal sex	OR 1.37 (0.65 to 2.89)
Benton105	Swiss quality seal: Australian standard condom	Condom breakage during anal sex	OR 0.20 (0.04 to 0.92)
Renzi106	Baggy condom: straight shafted condom	Condom breakage during sex (over specified time period)	OR 1.34 (0.46 to 3.89)
Renzi106	Baggy condom: straight shafted condom	Slippage during sex	OR 0.85 (0.57 to 1.26)
Renzi106	Female reality condom for anal sex	Breakage reported by men (receptive partners)	OR 1.71 (0.74 to 3.96)
Macaluso107	Female reality condom for anal sex	Slippage reported by men (receptive partners)	OR 2.68 (1.92 to 3.75)
Macaluso107	Female reality condom for anal sex	Slippage reported by men (insertive partner)	OR 34.10 (18.97 to 61.27)