Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 27.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Physiol. 1996 Oct;271(4 Pt 2):H1643–H1655. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1996.271.4.H1643

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Effect of sampling frequency of noisy pseudodata on simultaneous estimates of flow (A), VSV (B), and VLV (C). Values are means ± SD of fits of 75 independent realizations of noisy pseudodata. Estimates from 2 sets of pseudodata are shown. For ●, true value (horizontal line) was flow = 2 ml·min−1·g−1. For ◆, flow = 1 ml·min−1·g−1. For both sets, VSV = 0.11 ml/g and VLV = 0.028 ml/g. Estimates of VSV were indistinguishable in both sets of pseudodata (only 1 set is shown). For both flow rates, variability increased markedly with sampling frequencies of <2 samples/s, and flow was systematically overestimated with frequencies below ~1 sample/s.