Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cult Health Sex. 2011 Feb;13(2):141–156. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2010.520740

Table 4.

Significant determinants of women’s sexual expression; married women ages 16–25 in Bangalore, India, 2005–2006.£

VARIABLES (reference in parentheses) Model 1 Model 2
Told husband
want to have sex
(at midline)
Told husband do
not want to have
sex (at midline)
Coef. p-value Coef. p-value
Husbands’ perceptions (at baseline)
Husbands feel it is ok if wives demonstrate:
    1 form of sexual discussion and expression (0 forms) 2.799** 0.027 1.578** 0.042
    2 forms of sexual discussion and expression (0 forms) 2.382* 0.055 1.190* 0.07
    3 forms of sexual discussion and expression (0 forms) 2.024* 0.097 1.421** 0.038
Women’s sexual expression at baseline
Told or showed husband want to have sex (did not) 1.687*** <0.001
Told or showed husband did not want to have sex (did not) 1.882*** <0.001
General couple discussion (at baseline)
Ever talked to husband about sex – wife’s report (has not talked) 0.715* 0.080 0.481 0.252
Resources (at baseline)
Number of living children 0.055 0.798 0.515** 0.027
Household asset score – baseline −0.112 0.580 0.403* 0.069
Constant −5.077*** <0.001 −1.144 0.264
Observations 185 185
Pseudo R-squared 0.1870 0.1842

p values in parentheses

***

p<0.01,

**

p<0.05,

*

p<0.1

£

We report only the statistically significant (p<0.10) variables. The models also control for husband-wife age difference; marital duration; education difference; women’s report of ever openly disagreeing with husbands, preparation for first sex, work prior to marriage, perception that husband is primary source of social support; and husband has a stable job at midline.