Table 4.
Significant determinants of women’s sexual expression; married women ages 16–25 in Bangalore, India, 2005–2006.£
| VARIABLES (reference in parentheses) | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Told husband want to have sex (at midline) |
Told husband do not want to have sex (at midline) |
|||
| Coef. | p-value | Coef. | p-value | |
| Husbands’ perceptions (at baseline) | ||||
| Husbands feel it is ok if wives demonstrate: | ||||
| 1 form of sexual discussion and expression (0 forms) | 2.799** | 0.027 | 1.578** | 0.042 |
| 2 forms of sexual discussion and expression (0 forms) | 2.382* | 0.055 | 1.190* | 0.07 |
| 3 forms of sexual discussion and expression (0 forms) | 2.024* | 0.097 | 1.421** | 0.038 |
| Women’s sexual expression at baseline | ||||
| Told or showed husband want to have sex (did not) | 1.687*** | <0.001 | ||
| Told or showed husband did not want to have sex (did not) | 1.882*** | <0.001 | ||
| General couple discussion (at baseline) | ||||
| Ever talked to husband about sex – wife’s report (has not talked) | 0.715* | 0.080 | 0.481 | 0.252 |
| Resources (at baseline) | ||||
| Number of living children | 0.055 | 0.798 | 0.515** | 0.027 |
| Household asset score – baseline | −0.112 | 0.580 | 0.403* | 0.069 |
| Constant | −5.077*** | <0.001 | −1.144 | 0.264 |
| Observations | 185 | 185 | ||
| Pseudo R-squared | 0.1870 | 0.1842 | ||
p values in parentheses
p<0.01,
p<0.05,
p<0.1
We report only the statistically significant (p<0.10) variables. The models also control for husband-wife age difference; marital duration; education difference; women’s report of ever openly disagreeing with husbands, preparation for first sex, work prior to marriage, perception that husband is primary source of social support; and husband has a stable job at midline.