Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 29.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2007 May 24;54(4):511–533. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.026

Table 2. Comparison of the Basic Structure Determination Methods.

Atomic resolution possible? Typical resolution ranges Size ranges Resolvable features Limitations Minimal amount of sample required Dynamic information
X-ray diffraction yes 1.5–4 Å from short peptides to MDa complexes and icosahedral viruses atoms, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure requires crystals, stringent purity 100–500 μl of 5–30 mg ml−1 ordered versus disordered regions
Single-particle EM no negative stain limited to ∼20 Å; particles in ice, ∼10 Å proteins >250 kD (negative stain); >400 kD (particles in ice) domain organization limited resolution ∼100 μl of 0.1 mg ml−1 can image multiple conformations from one sample
Electron diffraction yes 1.5–7 Å 15–250 kD atoms, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure requires 2D crystals or helical tubes ∼100 μl of 1 mg ml−1 ordered versus disordered regions
SAXS no 10–20 Å 10 kD to 0.6 MDa domain organization limited resolution 100 μl of 5–30 mg ml−1 no
NMR Yes 1.5–3 Å for backbone atoms limited to <∼40 kDa atoms, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structure sample molecular weight 100–500 μl of 5–30 mg ml−1 atom-specific dynamics can be measured