. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 30.

Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Jun;71(3):575–586. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.3.575

Table 4.

Sexual Distortion by Abused Profile Subgroups

Distortion type	MP subgroup (n = 34)		SP subgroup (n = 23)		BF subgroup (n = 20)		Comparison (n = 89)
Distortion type	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD
Sexual preoccupation	38.83	12.23	42.74	9.83^a	42.13	12.87	38.14	11.37
Sexual aversion^b	0.05	1.14	−0.18	0.73	0.42	1.21^a,^c	−0.04	0.99
Sexual ambivalence^d	0.02	0.89	0.01	0.84	0.61	1.17^a,^c,^e	−0.13	1.00

Note. Age and marital or cohabitation status are controlled in each analysis. Post hoc Student Newman–Keuls tests were performed to discern which means differed significantly from one another while controlling for multiple tests. MP = multiple perpetrator abused profile subgroup; SP = single perpetrator abused profile subgroup; BF = biological father abused profile subgroup.

Differs from comparison group at p < .05.

(−1 × sexual permissiveness) + negative attitude toward sex; z scores presented.

Differs from SP subgroup at p < .05.

Sexual preoccupation + sexual aversion; z scores presented.

Differs from MP subgroup at p < .05.