Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 30;5(12):e14466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014466

Table 3. Haplotype analysis for NOD2 SNPs in the CD patient cohort.

NOD2 haplotypes p-value OR CI lower CI upper
rs2066843-rs2066844 1.31×10−8
TT 1.34×10−5 1.94 1.81 2.08
TC 3.09×10−4 1.34 1.28 1.40
CC 1.72×10−8 0.65 0.63 0.66
rs2066844-rs2066845 7.94×10−8
CC 3.25×10−3 1.80 1.58 2.06
TG 3.80×10−6 1.89 1.78 2.00
CG 1.08×10−8 0.52 0.50 0.54
rs2066845-rs2066847 1.09×10−18
GC 6.88×10−17 4.06 3.90 4.22
CX 6.67×10−3 1.74 1.50 2.02
GX 4.38×10−20 0.32 0.31 0.33
rs2066847-rs2076756 2.48×10−15
CG 2.88×10−14 3.84 3.67 4.02
XG 3.31×10−1 1.09 0.91 1.30
XA 2.35×10−9 0.62 0.61 0.64
rs2066843-rs2066844-rs2066845 5.94×10−10
TCC 1.16×10−3 1.90 1.69 2.14
TTG 8.40×10−7 2.01 1.90 2.13
TCG 2.64×10−2 1.21 1.12 1.31
CCG 9.68×10−10 0.62 0.61 0.64
rs2066844-rs2066845-rs2066847 8.22×10−24
CGC 5.84×10−17 4.07 3.91 4.23
CCX 1.08×10−2 1.70 1.45 1.99
TGX 3.59×10−6 1.89 1.78 2.00
CGX 4.19×10−26 0.37 0.36 0.37
rs2066845-rs2066847-rs2076756 2.48×10−15
GCG 5.41×10−17 4.09 3.93 4.25
CXG 1.04×10−3 1.94 1.72 2.19
GXG 3.47×10−1 0.92 0.76 1.11
GXA 3.89×10−12 0.59 0.57 0.60
rs2066843-rs2066844-rs2066845-rs2066847 1.60×10−23
TCGC 4.10×10−17 4.28 4.11 4.46
TCCX 1.18×10−3 1.90 1.69 2.14
TTGX 8.51×10−7 1.99 1.88 2.10
TCGX 2.32×10−5 0.66 0.63 0.69
CCGX 8.57×10−13 0.59 0.58 0.60
rs2066844-rs2066845-rs2066847-rs2076756 1.14×10−23
CGCG 5.20×10−17 4.04 3.89 4.20
CCXG 1.10×10−3 1.93 1.71 2.18
TGXG 4.75×10−7 2.06 1.95 2.18
CGXG 1.24×10−5 0.642 0.61 0.67
CGXA 7.82×10−13 0.59
rs2066843-rs2066844-rs2066845-rs2066847-rs2076756 1.43×10−21
TCGCG 6.33×10−17 4.18 4.02 4.35
TCCXG 1.07×10−3 1.93 1.71 2.18
TTGXG 6.00×10−7 2.05 1.94 2.17
TCGXG 9.42×10−5 0.67 0.64 0.71
TCGXA 6.48×10−2 0.576 0.42 0.79
CCGXA 2.01×10−11 0.61 0.60 0.63

Omnibus as well as individual p-values are presented.