Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 20;286(1):429–440. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.138313

TABLE 2.

Substrate specificity of OPB

To test the predictive power of the PS-SCL, fluorogenic substrates were obtained that were predicted to be either good or poor matches by the PS-SCL results. Substrates were grouped and listed by decreasing initial cleavage velocities. Percentage activity is normalized to the initial velocity observed using the Z-PR-AMC substrate. All assays were performed at pH 8.0 using 20 μm substrate (except for those used to calculate Kcat and Km values). The PS-SCL predicted that the ideal P2 amino acid would be Gly. Therefore, Z-GGR-AMC and Z-GPR-AMC, which differ only in the P2 position, were compared as substrates for OPB, and the kinetic parameters were calculated. These assays were performed at substrate concentrations ranging from 80 to 0.2 μm.

N-terminal group P5 P4 P3 P2 P1 Relative activity N-terminal group P5 P4 P3 P2 P1 Relative activity
% %
Z G G R 197 H A 0
Boc L G R 108 Ac D E V D 0
Z G P R 104 Z V A D 0
Z P R 100 Ac W E H D 0
Z V V R 92 Z L L E 0
Glut G R 91 Suc A A F 0
Z R R 89 Suc P S P F 0
Z L R 78 H G F 0
Boc L R R 69 H L 0
Ac F R 62 Z G G L 0
Ac K Q K L R 51 Z A E N 0
Z F R 50 Ac A S N 0
Z A A R R 40 Ac A V N 0
Boc E K K 32 Suc G P L G P 0
Boc R V R R 31 Suc L Y 0
Ac F R S L K 23 Suc L L V Y 0
Boc V R K 21 TFA Y 0
H R 6
H K 1
Kinetic parameter Z-GPR-AMC Z-GGR-AMC
Kmm) 7.76 3.08
Kcat (s−1) 4.25e4 6.83e4
Kcat/Km (s−1 μm−1) 0.55e4 2.22e4