Table 2. Similarities between PC axes in the two studies.
PC1MN | PC2MN | PC3MN | PC4MN | PC5MN | PC1RC | PC2RC | PC3RC | |
PC1MN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.02 | |
PC2MN | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | |
PC3MN | −0.03 | −0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 0.06 | |
PC4MN | 0 | −1 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.39 | 0.03 | |
PC5MN | 0.01 | −0.74 | −0.04 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.08 | |
PC1RC | −0.28 | 0.03 | −0.97 | 0.11 | 0.33 | 0 | 0 | |
PC2RC | −0.56 | 2.07 | 0.35 | −1.01 | −0.84 | 0 | 0 | |
PC3RC | −0.11 | 0.03 | 0.29 | −0.2 | 0.45 | −0.01 | 0.03 |
Adjusted R-squared above diagonal; Slope of regression below.