Abstract
Using a consensus sequence in inositol phosphate kinase, we have identified and cloned a 44-kDa mammalian inositol phosphate kinase with broader catalytic capacities than any other member of the family and which we designate mammalian inositol phosphate multikinase (mIPMK). By phosphorylating inositol 4,5-bisphosphate, mIPMK provides an alternative biosynthesis for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P3]. mIPMK also can form the pyrophosphate disphosphoinositol tetrakisphosphate (PP-InsP4) from InsP5. Additionally, mIPMK forms InsP4 from Ins(1,4,5)P3 and InsP5 from Ins(1,3,4,5)P4.
A multiplicity of the inositol phosphates exists in biology. The best known is inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3), a second messenger that releases intracellular calcium (1), whereas functions of other inositol phosphates have not been rigorously established. Inositol pyrophosphates, diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate (PP-InsP3/InsP7), and bis (diphospho) inositol tetrakisphosphate (bis-PP-InsP4/InsP8) contain high energy pyrophosphates that have been suggested to participate in protein phosphorylation (2). InsP7 and InsP8 are synthesized by separate InsP6 and InsP7 kinases (2). An InsP6 kinase (InsP6K) has been purified (2) and two InsP6 kinases, InsP6K1 and InsP6K2, have been cloned (3, 4). InsP7 kinase has been purified but not cloned (5).
Cloning of InsP6K revealed a homologous protein in yeast previously designated ArgRIII (also known as Arg-82p), because it influences the transcription of several enzymes regulating arginine metabolism (6, 7). We showed that ArgRIII is a yeast inositol polyphosphate multikinase (yIPMK) that can catalyze the ATP-dependent phosphorylation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 and Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (3, 8). A role for yIPMK in nuclear function was indicated by studies of York and collaborators (9), showing that a mutant yeast deficient in nuclear messenger RNA export lacks a gene that influences inositol phosphate metabolism. We and others (8–10) showed that yIPMK is the gene that determines messenger mRNA export from yeast nuclei. A role for the kinase activity of yIPMK in controlling gene transcription has been proposed (10) but challenged (11).
Despite considerable sequence heterogeneity among the several inositol phosphate kinases that we cloned, four key amino acids are conserved (3). This consensus sequence, P-x-x-x-D-x-K-x-G, is required for the catalytic activity of InsP3 kinase (InsP3K) (12). Recently, Mayr and associates (13) established that this domain modulates the catalytic site for phosphate transfer from ATP to the inositol ring. In a search for additional members of the inositol polyphosphate kinase family, we screened expressed sequence tag (EST) databases for proteins containing this consensus sequence. We now report the cloning and characterization of mammalian IPMK (mIPMK). We have discovered an unprecedented substrate specificity whereby mIPMK can synthesize InsP3 from Ins(4,5)P2, InsP4 from Ins(1,4,5)P3, InsP5 from Ins(1,3,4,5)P4; and the inositol pyrophosphate diphosphoinositol tetrakisphosphate (PP-InsP4) from InsP5. mIPMK provides an alternative pathway for the formation of InsP3 and diphosphorylated inositol phosphates.
Materials and Methods
Materials.
Nonradioactive Ins(1,4)P2 and Ins(4,5)P2 were purchased from Sigma. Stock solutions were prepared in 1 mM EDTA. [3H]Ins(1,4)P2, [3H]Ins(1,4,5)P3, [3H]Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, [3H]InsP6 and [γ-32P]ATP were purchased from NEN. [3H]Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 was prepared by phosphorylating [3H]Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 by using yIPMK (8), and PP-[3H]InsP5 and PP-[3H]InsP4 were prepared by phosphorylation of [3H]InsP6 and [3H]Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5, respectively, using the InsP6K1 (14). All of the radiolabeled inositol phosphates that we synthesized were purified by HPLC and desalted (15). Polyethyleneimine (PEI)-cellulose TLC plates were obtained from J.T. Baker.
Identification and Cloning of Rat IPMK.
We used a region of about 40 aa of mouse InsP6K surrounding the consensus sequence P-C-x-x-D-x-K-x-G (3) to screen the EST data bank using the TBLAST program (16). The rat EST UI-R-A1-du-c-04–0-UI (GenBank accession no. AA955187; gene info identifier: 4234270) contained the consensus sequences P-C-x-x-D-x-K-x-G, but had an overall weak similarity with other members of inositol kinase family of enzyme. The EST was purchased from Research Genetics (St. Louis) and used to screen a λZapII Rat hippocampal cDNA library as described (17). The Bluescript plasmid recovered from the positive phage was sequenced on both strands by using a Perkin–Elmer ABI Prism 310 genetic analyzer.
Preparation of Recombinant Protein.
The ORF for rat IPMK was PCR-amplified from the phage clone using the following primers: 5′-GCAGGATCCGATGGCCGCCGAGCCCCCAGC-3′ and 5′-GCAGAATTCCCGGGTTACAGACGAGTACAAGGT-3′; the PCR product was subcloned into the BamHI and EcoRI sites of the pTrcHisB expression vector (Invitrogen). The methods used to transform Escherichia coli (strain BL21), to induce with isopropyl-1-thio-d-galactopyranoside, and to isolate the poly(His)-tagged proteins using Talon resin (CLONTECH) were all according to the manufacturers' recommendations.
Enzyme Assays.
Recombinant rat IPMK (10–20 ng) was incubated for various times at 37°C in 20 μl of buffer containing 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.0), 6 mM MgCl, 1 mM DTT, 10 mM ATP, 2 mM NaF, 20 mM phosphocreatine, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.01 mg/ml phosphocreatine kinase (Calbiochem). About 5,000 cpm of the appropriate 3H-labeled inositol phosphate was added. Assays were quenched with ice-cold perchloric acid and neutralized before HLPC analysis (18). Briefly, assays of the activities of recombinant enzymes used HPLC using a 4.6 × 125-mm Partisphere SAX column (Whatman) that was eluted with a gradient generated by mixing buffer A (1 mM Na2 EDTA) and buffer B [buffer A plus 1.3 M (NH4)2HPO4, pH 3.8, with H3PO4] as follows: 0–5 min, 0% B; 5–10 min, 0–30% B; 10–60 min, 30–100% B; 60–75 min, 100% B. Fractions (1 ml) were collected and counted by using 5 ml of Ultima-Flo AP LCS-mixture (Packard). The reactions using unlabeled InsP2 isomer were performed as described above, using 1 μM of the unlabeled InsP2 isomer and 5 μl of [γ-32P]ATP (3,000 cpm/mmol). The reactions were stopped by addition of 2 μl of TLC running buffer (0.6 M HCl). Reaction mixture (1–3 μl) was spotted onto a PEI-TLC plate. Separation of [γ-32P]ATP and [32P]InsP3 was achieved by incubation of the sheet in a tank of TLC running buffer (3). Sheets were air-dried, and the radioactivity was detected by using Kodak X-Omat film.
Northern Blot Analysis.
Total RNA from various rat organs was prepared using LiCl precipitation methods (17). RNA (10–20 μg) was loaded on 1% agarose/formaldehyde/Mops gel and transferred to Hybond N+ nylon membrane (Amersham Pharmacia). ORFs for rat IPMK were labeled with [α-32P]dCTP using oligo labeling as described (17). Hybridization and washing were carried out following the manufacturer's instructions.
In Situ Hybridization.
Fresh-frozen rat brain sections (2 to 3 mo old, SD male) were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS and permeabilized, prehybridized, and hybridized in 50% formamide/5% SSC with 100 ng/ml unhydrolyzed digoxygenin-labeled probe overnight at 55°C. Sections were washed, blocked, and incubated overnight at 4°C in 4% normal goat serum in TBS with antidigoxygenin-AP antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) at 1:5,000. After washing in TBS, slides were developed with 1 ml of color development solution containing 3.375 mg/ml nitroblue tetrazolium, 3.5 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate, and 0.24 mg/ml levamisole, in the dark. The color reaction was allowed to run 48 h at room temperature. The reaction was stopped in ddH2O, and the slides were sealed in Aquapolymount. Unique probes mIPMK were generated from cDNA corresponding to ORF of mIPMK subcloned in Bluescript SK(+) plasmid (Stratagene), and antisense and sense cRNA probes were generated by T7 and T3 RNA polymerases. Sense control probes used at equal concentration generated no specific signal.
Results
Using the consensus sequence that we characterized in the family of inositol phosphate kinases (3), we identified a rat EST (UI-R-A1-du-c-04–0-UI; GenBank accession no. AA955187; gene info identifier: 4234270). We used this EST to screen a rat hippocampal cDNA library leading to identification and cloning of a full-length cDNA comprising 5,432 nt (sequence deposited in GenBank with the accession no. AY014898). The cDNA cloned contains an ORF of 396 aa (Fig. 1) located in the 5′ region. We have assigned the initiation codon to the ATG at position 115, that is preceded by an in-frame stop codon 30 bases upstream. The extremely long 3′ untranslated region is characteristic of the inositol phosphate kinase family (19, 20).
The ORF codes for a protein of 44.4 kDa. This protein displays <30% overall homology to InsP6K1 or 2 and <25% homology to InsP3KA, B, or C (Fig. 1). Among inositol phosphate kinases, the N-terminal half is generally regarded as regulatory, whereas the catalytic area is confined to the C-terminal portion. The C-terminal half of the gene displays about 40% similarity to InsP3Ks and InsP6Ks with four very well-conserved domains (Fig. 1). The inositol phosphate binding (12) and catalytic domains (13) characteristic of all members of this family of enzymes (3, 4) are highly conserved (amino acids 110–152). The ATP binding site previously characterized in InsP3K (21) is also present in mIPMK (amino acids 361–368). The C-terminal domain (last 19 aa), important for the catalytic activity of InsP3K (12) as well as the InsP6Ks (A. Saiardi and S.H.S., unpublished observations), is also well conserved. Finally, we have identified a domain, designated “SSLL” (amino acids 232–241), present in all of the members of this family of enzymes. This region is required for the enzymatic activity of InsP6Ks (A. Saiardi and S.H.S., unpublished observations).
We examined the enzymatic activity of the protein expressed as His-tag in E. coli. The recombinant protein was incubated with a variety of radiolabeled inositol phosphates, and products were separated by Partisphere SAX column chromatography (8, 18). We failed to detect any metabolic activity when enzyme preparations were incubated with [3H]InsP6 or [3H]InsP7 (data not shown). We observed considerable enzymatic activity after incubation with [3H]Ins(1,4,5)P3 (Fig. 2A). In the purchased specimen of [3H]Ins(1,4,5)P3, the InsP3 peak at 22 min was preceded by an apparent contaminant that elutes very similarly to Ins(1,4)P2. A peak representing Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 was detected at 10 min, most prominent at 30 min, and declines at 2 h. The decline of InsP4 at 2 h was accompanied by the appearance of a peak eluting like the Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 standard, which is the most prominent peak at 2 h. At 2 h, we also observed a new peak corresponding to 10% of the radioactive input with a migration identical to that of PP-InsP4. We failed to detect radioactive label corresponding to IP6.
We incubated [3H]Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 with the enzyme for 10, 30, or 120 min, and observed a time-dependent increase in the formation of a peak with a migration identical to Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5. At 120 min, we also observed the formation of PP-InsP4 (Fig. 2B). These findings establish that the conversion of Ins(1,4,5)P3 to InsP5 and PP-InsP4 proceeds through Ins(1,3,4,5)P4.
The decline of the [3H]Ins(1,4,5)P3 peak coincides temporally with the appearance of InsP4, InsP5, and PP-InsP4 peaks in a precursor–product relationship. The “contaminant” of [3H]Ins(1,4,5)P3 also declines with time, although less rapidly than InsP3 itself. Commercial preparations of InsP3 preparations are well known to be contaminated with isomers of InsP2 with levels of InsP2 increasing with time of storage (S. Shears, personal communication). Of the three isomers of InsP2 that could be formed from Ins(1,4,5)P3 [Ins(1,4)P2, Ins(1,5)P2, Ins(4,5)P2], the only radiolabeled one available to us is [3H]Ins(1,4)P2. To provide maximal opportunity for enzymes to act on Ins(1,4)P2, we incubated 10 times as much enzyme for 16 h with [3H]Ins(1,4)P2 (Fig. 3A). Only about 4–5% is converted to [3H]InsP3, implying that Ins(1,4)P2 is not the constituent of the [3H]InsP3 preparation that leads to the formation of higher inositol phosphates. To further explore the identity of the InsP2, we incubated unlabeled Ins(1,4)P2 and Ins(4,5)P2 with [γ-32P]ATP and separated products by TLC (Fig. 3B). We did not use Ins(1,5)P2 because samples were not available commercially. Incubation with Ins(4,5)P2 for 2 h leads to the appearance of radiolabeled InsP3, whereas no InsP3 is formed from Ins(1,4)P2. Thus, we conclude that the additional constituent of [3H]InsP3 preparations is Ins(4,5)P2. Most importantly, we have established that the cloned enzyme readily converts Ins(4,5)P2 to InsP3, representing a pathway for InsP3 biosynthesis.
In summary, these experiments demonstrate that the new enzyme has multiple inositol phosphate kinase activities. It can form InsP3, convert Ins(1,4,5)P3 to InsP4, Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 to InsP5, and InsP5 to PP-InsP4. Because of these multiple kinase activities, we designate the enzyme mIPMK.
We used Northern analysis to evaluate the tissue distribution of mIPMK (Fig. 4). mIPMK is most highly expressed in the kidney with various brain regions being second highest. Within the brain, highest expression occurs in the cerebellum, lowest in the hippocampus, whereas cerebral cortex is intermediate. We detected moderate levels of expression in heart and lung with negligible levels in liver and spleen. We observed three principal bands in the kidney, whereas lower levels of expression in the thymus and testes contained only the two lower bands. These findings suggest that alternative splicing leads to multiple isoforms of mIPMK.
We conducted in situ hybridization to examine the cellular localization of mIPMK in the brain (Fig. 5). In the hippocampus, mIPMK expression is confined to neuronal cell bodies with no evidence for expression in glial cells. Levels are most pronounced in the dentate gyrus, whereas moderate levels occur in all layers of the hippocampus. In the cerebellum, mIPMK expression appears exclusively in cell bodies of granule cells with no labeling of Golgi II, stellate, or basket cells and no evident expression in any glial subtype.
Discussion
The main finding of our study is the identification of mIPMK, whose range of inositol phosphate kinase activities greatly exceeds that of any previously described enzyme (Fig. 6). mIPMK can form InsP3 from Ins(4,5)P2, which may provide a biosynthetic route to InsP3 formation. The classic pathway for the formation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 involves the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol(4,5)P2 (PIP2) to InsP3 with the liberation of diacylglycerol (1, 22). In circumstances in which Ins(4,5)P2 levels accumulate, it is conceivable that mIPMK is an important source of InsP3. This could be relevant to the therapeutic actions of lithium in affective illness. Thus, therapeutic concentrations (1 mM) of lithium are known to inhibit inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase (23, 24). These concentrations of lithium also evoke a 10-fold augmentation of Ins(4,5)P2 levels in brain slices labeled with [3H]inositol, whereas levels of other inositol phosphates are increased much less (25, 26). Whether this effect is related to inhibition of inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase or a hitherto unidentified enzyme that removes phosphates at the 4 and 5 positions is unclear.
The ability of mIPMK to convert Ins(4,5)P2 to InsP3 may also account for the pronounced calcium-releasing activity of Ins(4,5)P2 (27). As other isomers of InsP2 fail to release calcium, we suggest that this calcium-releasing activity reflects conversion to Ins(1,4,5)P3.
The ability of mIPMK to form an inositol pyrophosphate is also notable, as phosphorylation of another phosphate bond is generally thought to reflect a different type of enzymatic activity than addition of a phosphate to a hydroxyl. The ability of this enzyme to carry out such disparate enzymatic activities suggests that it is a more primitive enzyme than other inositol phosphate kinases. In contrast, InsP3K and InsP6K are highly selective. InsP3K acts only on Ins(1,4,5)P3, whereas InsP6K1 and InsP6K2 are highly selective for InsP6 and InsP5 (14).
The wide substrate specificity of mIPMK suggests that it is a more primitive, phylogenetically older protein than InsP3K and InsP6K1. In terms of homology, the closest relative of mIPMK is a Drosophila gene named CG13688 (FlyBase ID: FBgn0031267) (28) and described as being InsP3K-like. If the Drosophila gene product does display enzyme activity similar to that of mIPMK, then genetic approaches in Drosophila might clarify the biological role of this enzyme.
Evolutionary conservation is evident in the existence of mIPMK in yeast. Interestingly, the substrate specificity of yIPMK is more narrow than that of mIPMK (8). yIPMK can convert Ins(1,4,5)P3 to Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 and Ins(1,4,5,6)P4, and the InsP4 to Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 but seems unable to convert InsP2 to InsP3 or InsP5 to inositol pyrophosphates. Because the yeast genome has been completely sequenced and yIPMK has the highest homology to mIPMK of any yeast gene, we are confident that yIPMK is the yeast homolog of mIPMK, a conclusion supported by their similar, although not identical, substrate specificity. The established role of yIPMK in nuclear export of mRNA suggests that mIPMK may possess a similar function in mammalian systems.
The identification of mIPMK can explain and perhaps simplify a variety of divergent enzymatic functions involving inositol phosphate kinase activities. Thus, the ability of mIPMK to phosphorylate at positions 1, 3, and 6 might account for such activities reported with a variety of substrates that include some that we have not directly examined ourselves. For instance, Shears and associates (29–31) reported enzymatic activity in rat that phosphorylates various inositol phosphates at 1, 3, 5, and 6 positions and might reflect mIPMK activity.
Acknowledgments
We thank A. Riccio for reading the manuscript and helpful comments. We thank P. Worley and T. Lanaham for providing the rat hippocampal cDNA library. We also thank S. Shears for suggestions and technical advice. This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grant MH18501 and Research Scientist Award DA00074 (to S.H.S.).
Abbreviations
- InsP3
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
- InsP5
inositol pentakisphosphate
- InsP6
inositol hexakisphosphate
- PP-InsP4
disphosphoinositol tetrakisphosphate
- IPMK
inositol polyphosphate multikinase
- yIPMK
yeast IPMK
- mIPMK
mammalian IPMK
- EST
expressed sequence tag
Footnotes
Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (accession no. AY014898).
References
- 1.Berridge M J, Lipp P, Bootman M D. Science. 2000;287:1604–1605. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5458.1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Voglmaier S M, Bembenek M E, Kaplin A I, Dorman G, Olszewski J D, Prestwich G D, Snyder S H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:4305–4310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.4305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Saiardi A, Erdjument-Bromage H, Snowman A M, Tempst P, Snyder S H. Curr Biol. 1999;9:1323–1326. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)80055-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schell M J, Letcher A J, Brearley C A, Biber J, Murer H, Irvine R F. FEBS Lett. 1999;461:169–172. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01462-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Huang C F, Voglmaier S M, Bembenek M E, Saiardi A, Snyder S H. Biochemistry. 1998;37:14998–5004. doi: 10.1021/bi981920l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dubois E, Bercy J, Messenguy F. Mol Gen Genet. 1987;207:142–148. doi: 10.1007/BF00331501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dubois E, Messenguy F. Mol Gen Genet. 1994;243:315–324. doi: 10.1007/BF00301067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Saiardi A, Caffrey J J, Snyder S H, Shears S B. FEBS Lett. 2000;468:28–32. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01194-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.York J D, Odom A R, Murphy R, Ives E B, Wente S R. Science. 1999;285:96–100. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5424.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Odom A R, Stahlberg A, Wente S R, York J D. Science. 2000;287:2026–2029. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.2026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dubois E, Dewaste V, Erneux C, Messenguy F. FEBS Lett. 2000;486:300–304. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)02318-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Togashi S, Takazawa K, Endo T, Erneux C, Onaya T. Biochem J. 1997;326:221–225. doi: 10.1042/bj3260221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bertsch U, Deschermeier C, Fanick W, Girkontaite I, Hillemeier K, Johnen H, Weglohner W, Emmrich F, Mayr G W. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:1557–1564. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.3.1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Saiardi A, Caffrey J J, Snyder S H, Shears S B. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:24686–24692. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002750200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Menniti F S, Miller R N, Putney J W, Jr, Shears S B. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:3850–3856. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Altschul S F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E W, Lipman D J. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Maniatis T, Fritsch E F, Sambrook J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd Ed. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shears S B. In: Signaling by Inositides: A Practical Approach. Shears S B, editor. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press; 1997. pp. 33–52. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Choi K Y, Kim H K, Lee S Y, Moon K H, Sim S S, Kim J W, Chung H K, Rhee S G. Science. 1990;248:64–66. doi: 10.1126/science.2157285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nagase T, Seki N, Ishikawa K, Ohira M, Kawarabayasi Y, Ohara O, Tanaka A, Kotani H, Miyajima N, Nomura N. DNA Res. 1996;3:341–354. doi: 10.1093/dnares/3.5.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Communi D, Takazawa K, Erneux C. Biochem J. 1993;291:811–816. doi: 10.1042/bj2910811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rebecchi M J, Pentyala S N. Physiol Rev. 2000;80:1291–1335. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Atack J R, Broughton H B, Pollack S J. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:343–349. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93926-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fauroux C M, Freeman S. J Enzyme Inhib. 1999;14:97–108. doi: 10.3109/14756369909036548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lynch B J, Muqit M M, Walker T R, Chilvers E R. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;280:974–982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jenkinson S, Challiss R A, Nahorski S R. Biochem J. 1992;287:437–442. doi: 10.1042/bj2870437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Burgess G M, Irvine R F, Berridge M J, McKinney J S, Putney J W., Jr Biochem J. 1984;224:741–746. doi: 10.1042/bj2240741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.The Flybase Corsortium. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:85–88. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shears S B. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:19879–19886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Craxton A, Erneux C, Shears S B. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:4337–4342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tan Z, Bruzik K S, Shears S B. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:2285–2290. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.4.2285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Higgins D G, Thompson J D, Gibson T J. Methods Enzymol. 1996;266:383–402. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)66024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dewaste V, Pouillon V, Moreau C, Shears S, Takazawa K, Erneux C. Biochem J. 2000;352:343–351. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]