Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2008 Jan 17;102(5):589–596. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.164970

Table.

Characteristics of Experimental Exposure Protocol of ApoE-Null Mice Fed a Normal Chow Diet

Experimental Parameter
Groups FA, FP, UFP
Exposure time (dates) 11/03/2005 to 12/12/2005
Exposure time (hours) 75
Total ambient particle no. (particles/cm3) 3.42 (±0.96)×104
No. concentration in FA chamber (particles/cm3) <5000
No. concentration in FP chamber (particles/cm3) 4.56 (±1.06)×105
Calculated UFP no. concentration in the FP chamber (particles/cm3) 3.88 (±1.06)×105
No. concentration in UFP chamber (particles/cm3) 5.59 (±1.23)×105
Ratio of UFP in the FP vs the UFP chamber* 1:1.44
FP chamber particle enrichment factor 13.35 (±1.6)
UFP chamber particle enrichment factor 16.4 (±1.8)
Mass in FP exposure chamber (μg/m3) 438.29
Mass in UFP exposure chamber (μg/m3) 112.61
PM2.5 mass in ambient air (μg/m3) 26.78
UFP mass in ambient air (μg/m3) 8.43

FA, FP, and UFP groups were exposed in a mobile laboratory located in downtown Los Angeles. Values shown are means(±SD).

*

This ratio was obtained by reducing the particle no. in the FP chamber by 15%, which represents the contribution of particles in the 0.18 –2.5 μm range. This also translates into an ≈2-fold increase in surface area if a spherical particle shape is assumed.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure