Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Feb;21(2):313–321. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9463-3

Table 2.

Association between MUC1 tagSNPs and risk of stomach cancer

SNP		Controls^a	Cases^a

	Genotype	n	n	OR (95% CI) ^b
rs6427184^c	TT	299	191	Reference
	CT	76	80	1.69 (1.17–2.44)^*
	CC	0	0	--
	CT/CC	76	80	1.69 (1.17–2.44)^*
rs4971052	GG	151	80	Reference
	AG	178	126	1.33 (0.93–1.90)
	AA	45	66	2.76 (1.72–4.42)^**
	AG/AA	223	192	1.62 (1.16–2.26)^*
rs4276913	TT	152	81	Reference
	CT	177	125	1.32 (0.93–1.89)
	CC	46	66	2.68 (1.68–4.28)^**
	CT/CC	223	191	1.60 (1.15–2.23)^*
rs4971088	AA	122	70	Reference
	AT	190	120	1.10 (0.76–1.61)
	TT	60	79	2.28 (1.45–3.57)^**
	AT/TT	250	199	1.39 (0.98–1.97)
rs4971092	AA	304	192	Reference
	AG	67	74	1.80 (1.23–2.63)^*
	GG	5	5	1.61 (0.45–5.71)
	AG/GG	72	79	1.79 (1.23–2.59)^*
rs4072037	GG	103	56	Reference
	AG	194	121	1.14 (0.77–1.70)
	AA	79	95	2.20 (1.41–3.44)^**
	AG/AA	273	216	1.45 (1.00–2.10)

^a

Sum of column did not add up to total study subjects because of missing data.

^b

Odds ratio (95% confidence interval), adjusted for age and sex.

^c

The P value of fitness for Hardy–Weinberg proportion in controls is 0.029.

^*

The permutation P value < 0.05.

^**

The permutation P value < 0.01.