Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2011 Jan 1;40(1):392–398. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.05.008

Table 1.

Longitudinal Intracohort Variation in Six RPWB Dimensions, Positively and Negatively Worded Items Combined: the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (N = 6,943) and MIDUS (N = 1,826)

RPWB Age Group I Age Group II Age Group III

WLS Age 32-51
(n = 603)
MIDUS Age 32-49
(n = 941)
WLS Age 52-56
(n = 5,883)
MIDUS Age 50-59
(n = 498)
WLS Age 57-75
(n = 457)
MIDUS Age 60-75
(n = 387)
Autonomy **
(0.07%)
***
(0.69%)
**
(0.07%)
***
(1.16%)
*
(0.03%)
*
(0.32%)
Environmental mastery ***
(0.26%)
***
(0.58%)
***
(0.14%)
***
(3.33%)
***
(0.26%)
***
(1.34%)
Personal growth ***
(0.65%)
***
(1.05%)
***
(0.54%)

(0.00%)
***
(0.43%)
*
(0.63%)
Positive relations with others ***
(0.08%)
***
(0.95%)
***
(0.55%)
***
(2.19%)

(0.00%)
*
(0.67%)
Purpose in life ***
(0.41%)

(0.00%)
**
(0.05%)

(0.00%)
***
(0.25%)
***
(1.17%)
Self-acceptance ***
(0.40%)

(0.00%)
***
(0.38%)
*
(0.37%)
***
(0.24%)

(0.00%)

Note. Entries in parentheses reflect between-year variance in a respective RPWB dimension based on adjusted R2 (i.e. the proportion of the variance explained by wave). The ages listed refer to 1993-1994 in the WLS and 1995 in MIDUS. Downward arrows denote a statistically significant decline in a respective dimension; upward arrows denote a statistically significant increase; the absence of an arrow indicates that this RPWB dimension has not changed significantly between the two waves. Asterisks denote significant differences in means:

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.