Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2011 Jan 1;40(1):392–398. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.05.008

Table 3.

Longitudinal Intracohort Comparison of Positively and Negatively Worded RWPB Items in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (N = 6,943)

RPWB Age 32-51
(n = 603)
Age 52-56
(n = 5,883)
Age 57-75
(n = 457)

P N P N P N
Autonomy
(0.00%)

(0.00%)
**
(0.07%)
*
(0.03%)
**
(0.60%)
***
(1.49%)
Environmental mastery *
(0.25%)
*
(0.35%)
***
(0.14%)
***
(0.26%)

(0.00%)

(0.00%)
Personal growth *
(0.34%)
*
(0.20%)
***
(0.54%)
***
(0.43%)
***
(1.71%)
***
(1.60%)
Positive relations *
(0.22%)

(0.00%)
***
(0.55%)

(0.00%)

(0.00%)
*
(0.40%)
Purpose in life
(0.00%)

(0.00%)
**
(0.05%)
***
(0.25%)

(0.00%)
**
(0.64%)
Self-acceptance
(0.00%)

(0.00%)
***
(0.38%)
***
(0.24%)
***
(1.20%)
**
(0.71%)

Note.P” refers to positively worded items; “N” refers to negatively worded items. Entries in parentheses reflect between-year variance in a respective RPWB dimension based on adjusted R2 (i.e. the proportion of the variance explained by wave). The ages listed refer to 1993-1994. Downward arrows denote a statistically significant decline in a respective dimension; upward arrows denote a statistically significant increase; the absence of an arrow indicates that this RPWB dimension has not changed significantly between the two waves. Asterisks denote significant differences in means:

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.