Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan;55(1):39–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02338.x

Table 3.

Baseline characteristics of study patients and delivered CRRT.

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3
Demographics*
Age (years) 63 (43–86) 68 (37–88) 67 (53–83)
Weight (kg) 80 (53–116) 86 (56–124) 79 (41–130)
Male sex, n (%) 7 (50) 7 (50) 5 (36)
APACHE II* 28.1 (19–44) 26 (13–36) 23.2 (15–29)
RIFLE score, points*, 37 39 39
Delivered CRRT*
CRRT treatment duration (h) 82 (17–278) 115 (37–207) 96 (29–210)
CRRT treatment mode CVVHDF CVVHDF CVVHDF
Effluent flow (ml/kg/h) calculated on active treatment time*, 23.7 (13–45) 21.9 (15–30) 18 (10–20)
Proportion of ordered dose delivered* 85.3% 87.5% 91.8%
Anticoagulation* None 3 None 2 None 2
Heparine 9 Heparine 11 Heparine 10
Prostacycline 1 Prostacycline 1 Prostacycline 2
Phosphate supplementation§ (mmol/CRRT treatment day) 11 (0–35) 3 (0–13) 0 (0)
*

Differences between groups were not statistically significant. Numbers in parentheses are range, unless stated otherwise.

We scored RIFLE-risk (R, risk; I, injury; F, failure; L, loss of kidney function; E, end-stage kidney disease) as 1, injury as 2, and failure as 3.

The dialysis dose in CRRT is expressed in terms of ml of effluent (dialysate+ultrafiltrate) per kg of body weight (BW) per hour (ml/kg/h).23

§

Statistical differences were as follows: between groups 1 and 2 (P=0.046), between groups 1 and 3 (P≤0.001), and between groups 2 and 3 (P=0.003).