Table 3.
Sensitivity analysis of Studies With Esophageal Lengthening (Collis or Collis-Nissen gastroplasty). Recurrence Rate for Gastroplasty vs Non-gastroplasty Repairs Within the Given Study (P < 0.0001)
| Study | n | Recurrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Gastroplasty | ||
| Mattar 2002 | 119 | 14 (11.7%) |
| Diaz 2003 | 110 | 21 (19%) |
| Champion 2003 | 34 | 1 (3%) |
| Pierre 2002 | 87 | 5 (5.7%) |
| Leeder 2003 | 53 | 5 (9.4%) |
| Ferri 2004 | 35 | 7 (20%) |
| Perdikis 1997 | 65 | 10 (15.3%) |
| Edye 1998 | 55 | 5 (9%) |
| Hashemi 2000 | 27 | 9 (33.3%) |
| Trus 1997 | 70 | 5 (7%) |
| Gantert 1998 | 55 | 2 (3.6%) |
| Wiechmann 2001 | 54 | 4 (7.4%) |
| Jobe 2002 | 52 | 11 (21%) |
| Total | 816 | 99 (12%) |
| Gastroplasty | ||
| Mattar 2002 | 6 | 0 |
| Diaz 2003 | 6 | 0 |
| Champion 2003 | 18 | 0 |
| Pierre 2002 | 113 | 0 |
| Trus 1997 | 6 | 0 |
| Total | 149 | 0 |