Table 3.

Assessment of the statistical significance of the differences between municipalities in answering the analysed questions, using the Kruskal–Wallis test

Variables	Chi-square	Df	Asymptotic significance
Do they plan to build a house	7.907	3	0.048
Do they plan to start a business	25.322	3	0.000**
Do they plan to run an agrotourism business	57.941	3	0.000**
Do they plan to farm organically	9.038	3	0.029*
Do they plan to sell the land	4.372	3	0.224
Do they plan to apply for a farming subsidy	28.545	3	0.000**
Natura 2000 will make it difficult to build a house	23.979	3	0.000**
Natura 2000 will make it difficult to start a business	4.442	3	0.218
Natura 2000 will make it difficult to run an agrotourism business	11.722	3	0.008*
Natura 2000 will make it difficult to farm organically	1.869	3	0.600
Natura 2000 will make it difficult to sell the land	12.586	3	0.006*
Natura 2000 will make it difficult to apply for a farming subsidy	3.822	3	0.281
Does the national park make life difficult for people here	26.770	3	0.000**
Is it important that the municipality has been included in the European network	12.106	3	0.007*
Is it worth extending the sites of protected nature in the area	7.875	3	0.049*
Is it also important to protect nature outside of the national park	24.688	3	0.000**
Would they vote for a candidate planning to extend the area of protected nature	6.852	3	0.077
Should the owners of the land decide themselves about the nature on their land?	22.745	3	0.000**
Do organisations that protect nature disadvantage the residents	16.575	3	0.001**
Would the town/village develop faster without the national park	30.098	3	0.000**

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005