Table 5.
Cisna | Komańcza | Jabłonka | Lipnica Wielka | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Running an agrotourism business | 19% | 4% | 4% | 1% |
n = | 28 | 6 | 7 | 1 |
Running an organic farm | 1% | 6% | 2.50% | 2% |
n = | 2 | 9 | 4 | 3 |
Owners of developed land | 78% | 70% | 81% | 74% |
n = | 63 | 53 | 77 | 64 |
Owners of cultivated agricultural land | 13% | 51% | 68% | 69% |
n = | 11 | 38 | 65 | 59 |
Owners of meadows | 48% | 67% | 72% | 72% |
n = | 39 | 50 | 68 | 62 |
Owners of land for development | 35% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
n = | 28 | 11 | 39 | 36 |
Owners of forest | 25% | 25% | 76% | 85% |
n = | 20 | 19 | 72 | 73 |
The important groups of potential beneficiaries are shown in the italicized font, and the potential conflict groups in the bold font. The percentages in the table do not come to 100 as these are answers to multiple choice questions