Table 1.
Method | Mouse-rat
(t1)
|
Human-rodent
(t2)
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
PC | PC Gamma | PC | PC Gamma | |
IP approach | ||||
44.0 ± 3.4 | 38.5 ± 3.2 | 113.4 ± 5.0 | 102.9 ± 5.0 | |
CD approach | ||||
d1 (ā = 0.76) | 40.7 ± 3.0 | 34.4 ± 2.8 | 112.3 ± 5.4 | 99.9 ± 5.3 |
d2 (ā = 0.76) | 39.1 ± 2.3 | 33.0 ± 2.0 | 110.0 ± 4.4 | 97.6 ± 4.4 |
d3 (a = 0.57) | 32.9 ± 2.3 | 95.5 ± 4.2 | ||
d3 (a = 0.28) | (25.2 ± 2.0) | (82.0 ± 4.0) | ||
dL (a = 0.5) | 32.0 ± 5.0 | 90.0 ± 10.0 |
d1, unweighted average distance; d2, average distance weighted with sequence length; d3, multiprotein gamma distance; dL, Lynch's distance. The standard errors for the CD approach were computed by the jackknife method. The standard errors of t̂1 and t̂2 obtained by using Eq. 5 for d3 with a = 0.57 were 2.0 and 4.0, respectively.