Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2010 Oct 6;106(2):428–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03135.x

Table 3.

Coverage of MI strategies in workshops and supervision by training conditions

Workshop Supervision

MI Skill EX TT EX TT
MI spirit 6.8 (0.4) 6.1 (0.8) * 6.3 (0.8) 5.3 (1.3) **
Open questions 6.7 (0.5) 6.5 (0.6) 6.2 (1.0) 5.4 (1.6) *
Reflections 6.9 (0.3) 6.4 (0.7) * 6.2 (0.9) 5.0 (1.5) *
Affirmations 6.1 (0.8) 5.9 (0.8) 6.1 (1.1) 5.2 (1.7) *
Fostering collaboration 6.4 (0.6) 6.1 (0.7) 5.8 (1.1) 5.1 (1.6) *
Motivation for change 5.9 (0.8) 6.0 (0.8) 5.5 (0.9) 5.5 (1.5) *
Client-centered discussion/feedback 6.4 (0.8) 6.1 (1.0) 6.0 (1.1) 5.0 (1.9) **
Exploring pros/cons/ambivalence 6.5 (0.6) 6.3 (0.8) 6.1 (0.9) 5.2 (1.7) **
Developing discrepancies 6.1 (0.9) 5.9 (1.0) 5.6 (1.2) 4.8(1.5) *
Change planning discussion 5.8 (0.9) 5.4 (1.2) 5.2 (1.2) 5.0 (1.6)
Reducing MI inconsistent strategies 6.6 (0.6) 6.0 (0.9) ** 5.0 (1.4) 5.4 (1.5)
Overall skillfulness 6.8 (0.4) 6.4 (0.6) ** 6.6 (0.8) 6.1 (1.0) *

Note. SS = Self-Study, EX = Expert, TT = Train-the-Trainer. Coverage was rated 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=infrequently, 4=somewhat, 5=quite a bit, 6=considerably, 7=extensively.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.