Table 3.
Workshop | Supervision | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MI Skill | EX | TT | EX | TT | ||
MI spirit | 6.8 (0.4) | 6.1 (0.8) | * | 6.3 (0.8) | 5.3 (1.3) | ** |
Open questions | 6.7 (0.5) | 6.5 (0.6) | 6.2 (1.0) | 5.4 (1.6) | * | |
Reflections | 6.9 (0.3) | 6.4 (0.7) | * | 6.2 (0.9) | 5.0 (1.5) | * |
Affirmations | 6.1 (0.8) | 5.9 (0.8) | 6.1 (1.1) | 5.2 (1.7) | * | |
Fostering collaboration | 6.4 (0.6) | 6.1 (0.7) | 5.8 (1.1) | 5.1 (1.6) | * | |
Motivation for change | 5.9 (0.8) | 6.0 (0.8) | 5.5 (0.9) | 5.5 (1.5) | * | |
Client-centered discussion/feedback | 6.4 (0.8) | 6.1 (1.0) | 6.0 (1.1) | 5.0 (1.9) | ** | |
Exploring pros/cons/ambivalence | 6.5 (0.6) | 6.3 (0.8) | 6.1 (0.9) | 5.2 (1.7) | ** | |
Developing discrepancies | 6.1 (0.9) | 5.9 (1.0) | 5.6 (1.2) | 4.8(1.5) | * | |
Change planning discussion | 5.8 (0.9) | 5.4 (1.2) | 5.2 (1.2) | 5.0 (1.6) | ||
Reducing MI inconsistent strategies | 6.6 (0.6) | 6.0 (0.9) | ** | 5.0 (1.4) | 5.4 (1.5) | |
Overall skillfulness | 6.8 (0.4) | 6.4 (0.6) | ** | 6.6 (0.8) | 6.1 (1.0) | * |
Note. SS = Self-Study, EX = Expert, TT = Train-the-Trainer. Coverage was rated 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=infrequently, 4=somewhat, 5=quite a bit, 6=considerably, 7=extensively.
p < .05.
p < .01.