Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep-Dec;3(3):148–152. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.74159

Table 1.

Comparison of epididymal sperm count, motility and progressive motility of sperm, weights of testis and epididymis among Group I (control), Group II (fed on NaF for 30 days) and Group III (fed on NaF for 60 days) using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test

Parameters Group I Mean ± SD Group II Mean ± SD Group III Mean ± SD ANOVA “F”-value P-value
Sperm count × 106/epididymis 162 ± 10.52 111.75 ± 17.48* 91.5 ± 11.25, 72.777 0.000
Sperm motility (%) 72.1 ± 3.28 59.1 ± 10.28* 55.9 ± 7.24 13.053 0.000
Progressive motility of sperm (%) 58.6 ± 6.02 47.1 ± 11.44* 39 ± 7.02 13.436 0.000
Testicular weight (g) 3.22 ± 0.46 2.86 ± 0.37* 2.63 ± 0.42 4.931 0.015
Epididymal weight (g) 0.63 ± 0.21 0.46 ± 0.06* 0.45 ± 0.05 5.835 0.008
*

Post-hoc Tukey test (P < 0.05) comparison between Groups I and II;

Post-hoc Tukey test (P < 0.05) comparison between Groups I and III;

Post-hoc Tukey test (P < 0.05) comparison between Groups II and III