Table 1.
Precision obtained with PACMIT using different folding schemes
| Method | Precisiona |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit fly*,b | Fruit flyc | Human*,b | Humanc | |
| PACMIT-0.0 | 0.900 | 0.900 | 0.483 | 0.483 |
| PACMIT-0.1 | 0.923 | 0.900 | 0.469 | 0.486 |
| PACMIT-0.2 | 0.947 | 0.923 | 0.466 | 0.493 |
| PACMIT-0.3 | 0.947 | 0.900 | 0.414 | 0.483 |
| PACMIT-0.4 | 0.923 | 0.878 | N.A. | 0.449 |
| PACMIT-0.5 | N.A.d | 0.860 | N.A. | 0.424 |
| PACMIT-MFES | 0.923 | 0.923 | 0.405 | 0.405 |
aPrecision obtained for the same sensitivity as that obtained by PACMIT-MFES, i.e. SE = 0.263 for the fruit fly and SE = 0.085 for the human.
bUsing RNAplfold with global folding (W = L = l).
cUsing RNAplfold with local folding (W = 80 and L = 40).
dNot available for the sensitivity cutoff.
*Used here and in the main text to denote global folding.