Table 3.
Table 3a: Gene content vs SSR abundance | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motif Size | ||||||||
Abundance | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 to 6 | Gene Content |
scaffold_18 | + | |||||||
scaffold_32 | + | + | + | |||||
scaffold_43 | + | + | ||||||
scaffold_58 | + | |||||||
scaffold_59 | + | |||||||
scaffold_62 | + | |||||||
scaffold_66 | - | |||||||
scaffold_67 | + | + | ||||||
scaffold_68 | + | |||||||
scaffold_74 | + | + | - | |||||
scaffold_76 | + | + | + | |||||
scaffold_81 | + | |||||||
scaffold_82 | + | + | - | |||||
scaffold_84 | - | |||||||
scaffold_85 | + | |||||||
scaffold_88 | + | |||||||
scaffold_90 | + | + | ||||||
scaffold_98 | - | |||||||
Table 3b: G/C content vs SSR heterozygosity | ||||||||
Motif Size | ||||||||
Heterozygosity | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 to 6 | G/C Content |
scaffold_7 | + | |||||||
scaffold_18 | + | |||||||
scaffold_19 | + | |||||||
scaffold_20 | + | |||||||
scaffold_24 | + | + | ||||||
scaffold_30 | + | + | + | + | ||||
scaffold_32 | + | |||||||
scaffold_33 | + | |||||||
scaffold_43 | + | |||||||
scaffold_63 | + | |||||||
scaffold_69 | + | |||||||
scaffold_75 | + | |||||||
scaffold_76 | + | + | + | |||||
scaffold_77 | + | + | ||||||
scaffold_82 | - | |||||||
scaffold_90 | + | + | + | + | ||||
scaffold_94 | + |
This table shows motif sizes that are significantly greater than (+) or less than (-) the overall scaffold mean.
Motif Sizes that are significantly different (2 standard deviations) from the overall scaffold mean using Generalized Extreme Studentized Deviate (ESD) are bolded (p < 0.05, df = 98). Column 2 to 6 is the cumulative sum of motif sizes 2 to 6 (homopolymers excluded).