Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 3;11:691. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-691

Table 3.

Gene content vs SSR abundance, and G/C content vs SSR heterozygosity

Table 3a: Gene content vs SSR abundance
Motif Size

Abundance 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 to 6 Gene Content

scaffold_18 +
scaffold_32 + + +
scaffold_43 + +
scaffold_58 +
scaffold_59 +
scaffold_62 +
scaffold_66 -
scaffold_67 + +
scaffold_68 +
scaffold_74 + + -
scaffold_76 + + +
scaffold_81 +
scaffold_82 + + -
scaffold_84 -
scaffold_85 +
scaffold_88 +
scaffold_90 + +
scaffold_98 -

Table 3b: G/C content vs SSR heterozygosity

Motif Size

Heterozygosity 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 to 6 G/C Content

scaffold_7 +
scaffold_18 +
scaffold_19 +
scaffold_20 +
scaffold_24 + +
scaffold_30 + + + +
scaffold_32 +
scaffold_33 +
scaffold_43 +
scaffold_63 +
scaffold_69 +
scaffold_75 +
scaffold_76 + + +
scaffold_77 + +
scaffold_82 -
scaffold_90 + + + +
scaffold_94 +

This table shows motif sizes that are significantly greater than (+) or less than (-) the overall scaffold mean.

Motif Sizes that are significantly different (2 standard deviations) from the overall scaffold mean using Generalized Extreme Studentized Deviate (ESD) are bolded (p < 0.05, df = 98). Column 2 to 6 is the cumulative sum of motif sizes 2 to 6 (homopolymers excluded).