Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul-Dec;3(2):113–118. doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.74036

Table 1.

Clinical and laboratory data of the studied patients with PEM compared with controls

Variant Age (months) Weight (kg) Height (cm) BMI (wt/ht2) Na (m eq/l) K (m eq/l) Ca (mg/dl) Total protein (g/dl) Albumin (g/dl) Hg (g/dl) WBCs (×103/μl) cTnT (ng/ml)
Patients (n=45) 11.24±7.88 5.4±1.6 63.4±8.93 13.33±2.19 137.4±5.23 3.82±0.54 8.64±1.25 61.43±9.68 34.38±8.4 9.39±1.6 10.52±4.23 0.01±0.01
Controls (n=25) 10.78±6.29 8.97±2.26 74.8±9.54 15.81±2.28 139.64±3.1 3.88±0.454 9.15±1.0 70.61±7.34 40.14±11.91 12.53±1.1 8.83±3.6 0.009±0.001
P-value NS <0.005* <0.005* <0.005* NS NS <0.005* <0.005* 0.025* <0.005* <0.005* 0.007*

PEM, Protein–energy malnutrition; BMI, body mass index; Na, serum sodium; K, serum potassium; Ca, serum calcium; Hg, hemoglobin level; WBCs, total leucocytic count; cTnT, cardiac troponin T. Quantitative variables are expressed as mean±standard deviation. Student’s t-test was used.

*

statistically significant result. NS, non-significant result