Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Oct 20;194(2):358–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.10.011

Table 1.

Z-scores of true RoD values in a distribution of randomly selected “focal” electrodes.

Max Cross Corr Delta coherence Theta Coherence Alpha Coherence Beta Coherence Gamma Coherence Mean Phase Coherence Spectral Correspondence F-E Similarity
Patient 1 −1.51 9.85 0.57 20.37 33.59 22.57 −0.41 −0.70 21.29
Patient 2 −1.81 1.19 −1.63 −2.58 −3.00 −2.40 −1.95 −0.06 7.16
Patient 3 4.75 5.14 6.96 8.23 5.77 4.61 4.41 7.67 9.20
Patient 4 −2.28 −2.39 −2.63 −2.18 −2.05 −1.55 −2.34 −1.52 2.84

For each patient and measure, a distribution of RoD values for randomly selected “focal” electrodes was formed and the z-score of the RoD value of the true SOZ electrodes is presented. The RoD z-score of the F-E similarity measure is higher than 2.576 for all patients demonstrating that the probability of achieving these results by chance is lower than .01. Surprisingly, for some of the measures a negative z-score is obtained. Negative value are caused when the SOZ electrodes are located in a region of the FH map which is dense with electrodes (both SOZ and non SOZ, see sub-figures 5g,5h and 5k for examples).