Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jul;91(7):1098–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.02.013

Table 3.

Mean Change from baseline to 6 weeks and 18 weeks by treatment group for median nerve conduction parameters

Treatment Group
0mT (sham) n=20 15mT n=20 45mT n=20
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Between group ANOVA§
SDL (msec)
Baseline 4.4 ± .8 4.2 ± .5 4.7 ± .9
6 weeks 4.2 ± .9 4.2 ± .5 4.7 ± 1.0
18 weeks 4.3 ± .9 4.3 ± .7 4.8 ± 1.2
Change B- 6 weeks .2 ± .3 (p=.022) .1 ± .2 (p=.326) 0 ± .4 (p=.872) (p=.160)
Change B-18 weeks 0 ± .4 (p=.685) −.1 ± .5 (p=.345) −.1 ± .6 (p=.493) (p=.768)
SNAP (µvolts)
Baseline 17.1 ± 8.5 19.0 ± 7.7 16.0 ± 11.6
6 weeks 18.2 ± 7.7 18.5 ± 8.3 16.0 ± 8.8
18 weeks 18.3 ± 7.9 16.9 ± 6.3 16.2 ± 10.3
Change B- 6 weeks 1.0 ± 6.4 (p=.474) .5 ± 7.0 (p=.734) 0 ± 6.0 (p=.974) (p=.734)
Change B-18 weeks −1.2 ± 7.4 (p=.488) 2.2 ± 7.3 (p=.202) −.3 ± 4.1 (p=.773) (p=.226)
MDL (msec)
Baseline 4.9 ± 1.1 4.9 ± .9 5.0 ± .8
6 weeks 5.0 ± 1.3 5.1 ± 1.6 5.0 ± .8
18 weeks 5.1 ± 1.3 5.2 ± 1.0 5.2 ± 2.4
Change B- 6 weeks −.2 ± .5 (p=.203) −.2 ± 1.2 (p=.429) .1 ± .6 (p=.626) (p=.533)
Change B-18 weeks −.3 ± .5 (p=.045) −.3 ± .8 (p=.149) −.1 ± .3 (p=.070) (p=.744)
CMAP (mvolts)
Baseline 5.4 ± 1.9 5.9 ± 2.9 5.7 ± 2.2
6 weeks 5.9 ± 1.9 5.1 ± 2.6 5.6 ± 2.7
18 weeks 5.9 ± 3.0 4.8 ± 2.1 4.3 ± .7
Change B- 6 weeks −.6 ± 1.9 (p=.227) .8 ± 2.5 (p=.174) .2 ± 2.0 (p=.721) (p=.167)
Change B-18 weeks −.5 ± 2.3 (p=.298) 1.1 ± 2.2 (p=.042) 0 ± 1.5 (p=.953) (p=.049)

Detailed description

SDL= median nerve sensory distal latency (peak)

SNAP=sensory nerve action potential (amplitude)

MDL=motor distal latency (onset)

CMAP=compound motor action potential (amplitude)

6 weeks = end of magnet wear

18 weeks = follow-up visit.

There were no significant between- group differences at 0–6 weeks, 6–18 weeks or 0–18 weeks in any of the outcome measures.