Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan;187(1):217–227. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.120808

TABLE 1.

Total quantitative effects of gBGC on heterosis and contribution of W → S mutations under the “overdominant-like” regime

No gBGC p = 1; b = 6.10−6 p = 0.03; b = 0.0002 p = 0.05; b = 0.0005 p = 0.003; b = 0.002
h = 0.1 Nm = 0.5 0.703 0.703a 0.708 0.726 0.711
11/2.4b 7/0.2 26/0.3 8/0.03
Nm = 1 0.576 0.575 0.581 0.604 0.585
9/2.4 6/0.2 26/0.3 8/0.03
Nm = 5 0.277 0.277 0.281 0.298 0.284
5/2.4 5/0.2 22/0.3 7/0.03
h = 0.2 Nm = 0.5 0.520 0.519 0.523 0.54 0.526
9/1.4 5/0.1 20/0.2 6/0.02
Nm = 1 0.378 0.377 0.382 0.4 0.385
7/1.4 5/0.1 21/0.2 6/0.02
Nm = 5 0.137 0.137 0.139 0.149 0.141
5/1.4 4/0.1 19/0.2 6/0.02
h = 0.3 Nm = 0.5 0.336 0.335 0.338 0.349 0.34
8/0.8 4/0.06 14/0.1 4/0.01
Nm = 1 0.221 0.22 0.223 0.233 0.224
7/0.8 4/0.06 16/0.1 4/0.01
Nm = 5 0.068 0.067 0.068 0.072 0.069
6/0.8 4/0.06 17/0.1 4/0.01
a

Total amount of heterosis: numerical integration of Equation 9 with u = 10−6, λ = 2, L = 106, and N = 100. Parameters of the DFEM are given in the main text.

b

Shilled entries show percentage of heterosis due to WS mutations for which b/(1 − h) < s < b/h and percentage of such mutations in the whole mutation spectrum.