Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 18;28(34):5061–5066. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1351

Table 3.

Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Model of Local Failure

Variable HR 95% CI P*
RX duration, days
    ≤ 53 1.00
    > 53 1.96 1.34 to 2.87 .0006
Treatment
    RT + FU + mitomycin 1.00
    RT + FU + cisplatin 1.02 0.68 to 1.53 .9220
    RT + FU 2.44 1.69 to 3.51 < .0001
Age, continuous 0.98 0.97 to 0.995 .0067
KPS
    90, 100 1.00
    60, 70, 80 1.64 1.18 to 2.26 .0030
T stage
    T1/T2 1.00
    T3/T4 1.961 1.459 to 2.635 < .0001
N stage
    N0 1.00
    NX/N1/N2/N3 1.62 1.20 to 2.19 .0018
Total primary central axis dose (Gy), continuous 0.98 0.96 to 0.995 .0119

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; RX, overall treatment; KPS, Karnofsky performance score.

*

P value from χ2 test using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Interpretation: An increase in dose of 1 Gy means a decrease in the hazard of local failure by 2%; an increase in dose of 5 Gy means a decrease in the hazard of local failure by 11%; an increase in dose of 10 Gy means a decrease in the hazard of local failure by 20%.