Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 18;28(34):5061–5066. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1351

Table A2.

Bivariate Models of CF, LRF, and TTF Adjusting for Treatment Group

End Point HR 95% CI P*
CF
    RT duration, days
        ≤ 44 1.00
        > 44 1.437 1.013 to 2.038 .0419
    Treatment
        RT + FU + mitomycin 1.00
        RT + FU + cisplatin 1.587 1.076 to 2.340 .0199
        RT + FU 1.983 1.249 to 3.148 .0037
LRF
    RT duration continuous + treatment 1.011 1.001 to 1.021 .0271
        RT + FU + mitomycin 1.00
        RT + FU + cisplatin 1.565 1.142 to 2.144 .0053
        RT + FU 2.515 1.783 to 3.548 < .0001
    RT duration, days
        ≤ 44 1.00
        > 44 1.364 1.040 to 1.789 .0250
    RT duration dichotomized + treatment
        RT + FU + mitomycin 1.00
        RT + FU + cisplatin 1.540 1.125 to 2.109 .0071
        RT + FU 2.531 1.794 to 3.571 < .0001
TTF
    RT duration continuous + treatment 1.010 1.001 to 1.019 .0270
        RT + FU + mitomycin 1.00
        RT + FU + cisplatin 1.471 1.112 to 1.945 .0069
        RT + FU 2.044 1.490 to 2.803 < .0001
    RT duration, days
        ≤ 44 1.00
        > 44 1.302 1.020 to 1.663 .0343
    RT duration dichotomized + treatment
        RT + FU + mitomycin 1.00
        RT + FU + cisplatin 1.451 1.097 to 1.918 .0091
        RT + FU 2.048 1.494 to 2.809 < .0001

Abbreviations: CF, colostomy failure; LRF, locoregional failure; TTF, time to treatment failure; HR, hazard ratio; RT, radiation therapy; FU, fluorouracil.

*

P value from χ2 test using the Cox proportional hazards model.