Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 4;119(1):78–83. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002258

Table 2.

Comparison of data for LAIV-induced cytokine increases in NLF among controls, SHS-exposed subjects, and active smokers [median (interquartile range)].

Parametera Controls (n = 23) SHS (n = 20) Smokers (n = 17)
IL-6
 Baseline 4.5 (1.3–16.1) 5.5 (1.8–13.7) 6.9 (3.8–14.4)
 Ratiomax 7.5 (4.7–20.2) 5.4 (1.8–11.2) 2.8* (1.2–8.0)
 RatioAUC 37.8 (23.1–70.5) 19.3* (8.0–24.4) 10.0# (5.4–23.2)
IP-10
 Baseline 2,592 (844–6,263) 3,527 (1,455–6,269) 2,332 (1,893–3,822)
 Ratiomax 9.1 (3.1–22.3) 4.6 (3.3–6.1) 4.2 (2.3–9.8)
 RatioAUC 31.2 (12.1–74.5) 21.5 (15.1–42.2) 19.2 (10.2–35.1)
IFNγb
 Baseline 5.0 (1.6–84.5) 2.3 (1.1–64.0) 53.4 (2.3–161.4)
 Ratiomax 20.8 (3.4–48.2) 6.5 (1.1–21.8) 3.0* (1.0–10.5)
 RatioAUC 64.5 (9.8–154.5) 32.9 (11.5–93.7) 14.1 (2.7–33.4)
a

Baseline indicates cytokine levels (pg/mL NLF) on day 0 (before LAIV administration). Ratiomax and RatioAUC are the ratio to baseline (day 0) maximum value and AUC during days 1–9 after LAIV inoculation.

b

For IFNγ measurements, n = 14 controls, n = 14 SHS, and n = 12 smokers.

*

p < 0.05, and

#

p < 0.001, vs. control, Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s posttest.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure