Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurochem. 2010 Dec 13;116(3):406–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07121.x

Table 1.

Effects of CCL2 on evoked electrical activities in CA1 neurons

Latency (ms) AP amplitude (mV) AP duration (ms) AHP (mV)
Control 18.9 ± 11.1 70.3 ± 6.4 1.6 ± 0.6 6.6 ± 5.9
 CCL2 23.4 ± 15.1 72.6 ± 9.6 1.8 ± 0.4 4.2 ± 3.3
 Washout 28.3 ± 17.5 71.7 ± 10.3 1.5 ± 0.4 3.4 ± 0.3

Values are mean ± SEM (n=7). There was no statistically significant difference between control and CCL2 on latency, amplitude, duration (measured at the halfway of AP amplitude) and after hyperpolarization (AHP) of the APs evoked by a depolarizing current pulse. AP: action potential.