Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2010 Sep 28;67(2):513–523. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01490.x

Table 2.

Model assessment and comparison: median mean squared error of the estimated covariate effects. Under comparison are the Cox model fittings based on the ICPW estimate, the DSIR estimate, the original predictors, and the spline basis of the original predictors, respectively.

Model ε Method n = 400 n = 800 n = 1200
(7) PH Cox-ICPW 0.656 0.619 0.603
Cox-DSIR 0.797 0.643 0.591
Cox-Linear 1.200 1.293 1.351
Cox-Spline 0.864 0.926 0.990

(7) PO Cox-ICPW 0.888 0.865 0.858
Cox-DSIR 1.091 0.978 0.936
Cox-Linear 1.321 1.369 1.435
Cox-Spline 1.046 1.124 1.175

(8) PH Cox-ICPW 0.511 0.403 0.353
Cox-DSIR 1.052 1.017 0.977
Cox-Linear 0.864 0.890 0.932
Cox-Spline 0.755 0.796 0.818

(8) PO Cox-ICPW 0.624 0.548 0.523
Cox-DSIR 1.122 1.104 1.131
Cox-Linear 0.911 0.938 0.975
Cox-Spline 0.816 0.881 0.900