Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atmos Environ (1994). 2011 Jan 1;45(2):493–502. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.023

Table 1.

PM EF (dichot samples) of field burning based on carbon balance and emission ratios to CO2 (n=4)

Field exp. EF, g m −2 paddy EF, g kg−1 of dry RS burned RS Moist., % MCE Rice species Dry mass, kg m−2 Wind m s−1
PM2.5 PM10 CO2 CO PM2.5 PM10 CO2 CO
Field 8 4.85 4.93 902 62 6.66 6.77 1238 85 33 0.940 Pit 2 0.73 1.1 (N)
Field 9 4.25 4.86 1049 78 5.43 6.21 1339 100 26 0.937 Path 1 0.78 3 (SE)
Field 10 5.75 6.02 533 50 10.85 11.35 1005 102 22 0.920 Sup 90 0.53 1.2 (SW)
Field 11 5.40 7.03 533 50 10.19 13.27 1005 102 22 0.920 Sup 90 0.53 1.2 (SW)
Average 5.1±0.7 5.7±1.0 754±263 62±10 8.3±2.7 9.4±3.5 1147±169 97±8 26±5 0.93±0.01 - 0.64±0.13a -

EFCO2 estimated based on carbon were available only for the last 4 field experiments (8–11)

a

- Average dry biomass for all 11 fields is 0.58±0.14 kg m−2

Pit 2: Pisanulok 2; Path1: Pathumthani 1; Sup90: Supanburi 90

MCE: modified combustion efficiency; na: not available.