. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 11.

Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2010;13(Pt 2):684–691. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15745-5_84

Table 1.

Overall overlap ratios of WM, GM, and VN by pairwise HAMMER algorithm, congealing method, and our groupwise registration method.

	WM	GM	VN	Overall
Pairwise HAMMER	63.86% (±3.87%)	57.25% (±2.18%)	76.51% (±3.70%)	65.64% (±3.15%)
Congealing Method	59.68%	51.09%	70.61%	59.43%
Our Method	75.81%	63.61%	81.16%	73.52%