Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 11.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Biomater. 2008 Apr 22;4(5):1126–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.002

Table 3.

Burst and cumulative release of BMP-2 from composite scaffolds in vitro and in vivo

Phase 1 (%/day) Phase 2 (%/day) Phase 3 (%/day) Phase 4 (%/day)




PBS Coll PBS Coll PBS Coll PBS Coll
In Vitro ^ ^
10 mM High 13.7 ± 3.6 26.9 ± 6.7* 3.6 ± 1.9 11.6 ± 1.7* 0.4 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.5* 0.7 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.4
40 mM High 11.9 ± 4.9 17.8 ± 6.1 1.8 ± 0.6 7.4 ± 1.2* 0.3 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.2* 0.3 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.1
PPF 56.3 ± 2.3^ 56.7 ± 2.9 4.6 ± 0.7 4.9 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.0 0.3 ± 0.0^ 0.2 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.0^

In Vivo
10 mM High 21.2 ± 2.7 4.0 ± 2.4 1.2 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.1
40 mM High 14.7 ± 0.7 5.0 ± 3.5 1.4 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 0.3
PPF 55.1 ± 4.1^ 8.2 ± 2.9 2.1 ± 0.5 0.3 ± 0.1^

Average percent values (% release per day) are given with standard deviations for n = 5–6 for in vitro groups and n = 3 for in vivo groups. Statistical significance (p<0.05) for gelatin crosslinking (10 mM, 40 mM, or PPF control scaffolds) is denoted by (^) and indicates significance for both comparisons with the other two groups. For buffer type (PBS vs. Coll), significance is noted by (*) (p<0.05).