Table 1.
Measures of quality of life after stroke
Name of the instrument | Covered domains | Time to complete (minutes) | Generic/specific | Type of information: perceived health status/ evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|
EuroQol (The EuroQol Group, 1999) [3] | mobility, self–care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression and an overall evaluation of health | 8 | generic | perceived health status |
McMaster Health Index Questionnaire (Chambers et al., 1976) [4] | physical, emotional, social | 20 | generic | both |
Nottingham Health Profile (Hunt et al., 1981) [5] | pain, physical mobility, emotional reactions, energy, social isolation sleep | 5 | generic | perceived health status |
London Handicap Scale(Harwood et al., 1994) [6] | mobility, physical independence, occupation, social integration, orientation, economic self– sufficiency and an overall handicap severity score | 5 | generic | perceived health status |
Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) (Wood-Dauphinee and Williams, 1988) [7] | daily functioning daily activity (work and school); recreational and social activities; general coping skills perception of self presentation of self to others | 10 | generic | perceived health status |
Frenchay Activities Index (Holbrook and Skillbeck, 1983) [8] | domestic chores, leisure/work, outdoor activities | 5 | generic | perceived health status |
36–Item Short–Form Health Survey – SF–36 (Ware et al. 1992) [9] | physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems mental health | 10–15 | generic | perceived health status |
Stroke–Adapted 30–Item Version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SA–SIP 30) (Van Straten et al.,1997, 2000) [10, 11] | body care and movement, social interaction, mobility, communication, emotional behavior, household management, alertness behavior, ambulation | 15 | specific | perceived health status |
WHOQOL – Bref (Skevington et al., 2004) [12] | physical, psychological, psychological, social relationships, environment, and general satisfaction with life and health. | 10–15 | generic | both |
Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index (stroke version) (Ferrans and Powers, 1985) [13] | health and functioning, social and economic, psychological/spiritual, family | 20–30 | specific | evaluation |
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS–59) (Duncan et al., 1999) [14] | strength, hand function, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, mobility, communication,emotion, memory and thinking, participation | 15–20 | specific | perceived health status |
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS–QOL) (Williams et al., 1999) [15] | mobility, energy, upper extremity, function, work/productivity, mood, self–care, social roles, family roles, vision, language, thinking, personality | 10–15 | specific | perceived health status |