Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 14;26(2):177–184. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1516-5

Table 3.

Multivariate Associations between Primary Care Physician and Practice Characteristics and Guideline-Consistent Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations

Guideline-consistent screening recommendations* p-value
All guideline-consistent vs. none Some guideline-consistent vs. none
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Physician background and experience
Age
<40 1.00 1.00 <0.001
40-49 0.55 (0.34, 0.88) 0.82 (0.52, 1.28)
50-59 0.39 (0.23, 0.67) 0.70 (0.43, 1.15)
≥ 60 0.17 (0.09, 0.35) 0.41 (0.24, 0.71)
Gender
Male 1.00 1.00 0.002
Female 0.94 (0.63, 1.41) 1.63 (1.20, 2.21)
International medical school graduate
Yes 1.00 1.00 0.064
No 1.99 (1.11, 3.58) 1.23 (0.87, 1.74)
Board certification
Yes 1.95 (1.12, 3.38) 1.42 (1.00, 2.03) 0.030
No 1.00 1.00
Medical school affiliation
Yes 1.27 (0.90, 1.80) 1.32 (0.98, 1.80) 0.151
No 1.00 1.00
Specialty
Family medicine/General practice 1.00 1.00 0.132
Internal medicine 0.63 (0.40, 0.99) 0.75 (0.53, 1.06)
Obstetrics/Gynecology 0.70 (0.46, 1.05) 0.68 (0.45, 1.03)
Practice environment and practice patterns
Practice type
Solo practice 1.00 1.00 <0.001
Single specialty group 3.09 (1.67, 5.69) 1.68 (1.12, 2.52)
Multi-specialty group 4.71 (2.54, 8.75) 1.45 (0.96, 2.19)
Other 1.93 (0.47, 7.92) 0.71 (0.22, 2.26)
Region
Northeast 0.67 (0.42, 1.07) 0.94 (0.66, 1.35) 0.014
North central 1.54 (0.98, 2.42) 1.45 (1.03, 2.04)
South 1.00 1.00
West 1.05 (0.69, 1.60) 0.99 (0.66, 1.47)
Number of patients per week
<76 1.00 1.00 0.008
76-100 0.76 (0.48, 1.23) 1.09 (0.72, 1.64)
≥101 0.45 (0.28, 0.72) 0.98 (0.66, 1.44)
Record systems
Paper charts 1.00 1.00 0.007
Partial EMR/transition to EMR 1.47 (0.92, 2.35) 1.15 (0.77, 1.71)
Full EMR 2.31 (1.50, 3.56) 1.44 (0.97, 2.14)
Number of CRC screening modalities recommended
1 or 2 1.00 1.00 <0.001
3 or 4 0.99 (0.57, 1.72) 3.43 (2.30, 5.12)
Physician perceptions of colorectal cancer screening
Availability of third party reimbursement
Very influential 1.70 (0.97, 2.96) 1.11 (0.74, 1.68) 0.101
Somewhat influential 1.37 (0.95, 1.98) 1.28 (0.98, 1.68)
Not influential 1.00 1.00
Patients preferences for CRC screening
Very influential 1.96 (1.18, 3.24) 1.92 (1.17, 3.15) 0.018
Somewhat influential 1.37 (0.89, 2.11) 1.72 (1.14, 2.59)
Not influential 1.00 1.00
Patient barriers to screening (composite measure)
Low (<8) 1.00 1.00 0.168
Intermediate (8-9) 1.56 (0.98, 2.46) 1.21 (0.86, 1.70)
High (≥10) 0.91 (0.57, 1.43) 0.95 (0.67, 1.34)
Physician social support and influence
Clinical evidence in published literature
Very or somewhat influential 3.25 (0.82, 12.84) 3.75 (1.39, 10.10 0.028
All other 1.00 1.00
Local CRC screening practice
Very influential 0.45 (0.24, 0.82) 0.53 (0.35, 0.79) 0.005
Somewhat influential 0.49 (0.33, 0.73) 0.76 (0.56, 1.03)
Not influential 1.00 1.00

*Estimates are weighted for selection probability and non-response using survey design variables and SUDAAN statistical software

CRC=colorectal cancer screening EMR=electronic medical record FOBT=fecal occult blood test DCBE=double contrast barium enema USPSTF=U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ACS=American Cancer Society

National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Cancer Screening Recommendations and Practices, 2006-2007

Exact wording of all items is available at http://healthservices.cancer.gov/surveys/screening_rp/screening_rp_colo_lung_inst.pdf

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure