Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan;13(1):24–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00228.x

Table 2.

Technical details and complications of the RFA procedures

Ablation access Percutaneous 75 (97%)

Open surgical 2 (3%)

Imaging guidance US 36 (47%)

CT 8 (10%)

CT & US 33 (43%)

Total RFA procedures 1 RFA 58 (75%)

2 RFA 12 (16%)

3 RFA 5 (6%)

4 RFA 2 (3%)

 Mean/ patient 1.4 (range 1–4)

Number of tumours ablateda 1 tumour 70 (91%)

2 tumours 6 (8%)

3 tumors 0 (0%)

4 tumors 1 (1%)

 Mean number ablated 1.1 (range 1–4)

Diameter of largest tumour nodulea 2.6 cm (range 0.6–4.5 cm)

Ablation electrodes utilized LeVeen 61 (79%)

Cool-tip 7 (9%)

Berchtold 7 (9%)

RITA StarBurst 2 (3%)

Primary technique effectivenessab 83% (64/77)

Complications Major none

Minor n = 2 Left portal vein thrombus

Vasovagal reaction

No deaths
a

Data presented for the first RFA procedure only.

b

Defined as patients with a complete radiological response as measured on the first contrast enhanced imaging post-ablation.

LeVeen electrode (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA); Cool-tip electrode (Covidien/Valleylab, Boulder, CO); Berchtold electrode (Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro, NJ); RITA StarBurst electrode (AngioDynamics, Queensbury, NY).

RFA, radiofrequency ablation; US, ultrasound; CT, computed tomography; cm, centimetres.