TABLE 5.
Abundance-based microbial community analysis by SONSa
| Community analyzed by SONS and parameter | Stirred vs unstirred |
Impacted vs unimpacted |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HL | SM | SR | VM | Stirred | Unstirred | |
| Archaeal | ||||||
| Shared Chaob | 6.6 | 37.7 | 29.0 | 10.9 | 47.0 | 15.3 |
| ThetaYCc | 0.15 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.15 | 0.22 |
| Jaccard indexd | 0.40 | 0.78 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.35 |
| Sorensen indexd | 0.57 | 0.88 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.52 |
| Bacterial | ||||||
| Shared Chao | 3.5 | 7.5 | 20.8 | 19.0 | 5.8 | 10.5 |
| ThetaYC | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 0.72 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| Jaccard index | 0.33 | 0.63 | 0.98 | 0.89 | 0.58 | 0.77 |
| Sorensen index | 0.50 | 0.77 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.74 | 0.87 |
Community similarities are compared at each site between treatments as well as between agriculturally impacted versus unimpacted sites for each treatment.
Estimate of the number of OTUs that are shared between the two communities.
Nonparametric maximum-likelihood estimate of similarity (65).
The probability that a randomly selected OTU is found in both communities (given that it is in at least one of the communities).