TABLE 1.
Sample | Biopsy date (day/mo/yr) | Farm and cowa | Location of isolation | BDD statusb | Selection antibioticsc | Treponeme(s) isolatedd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6/5/05 | Farm 1, cow 1 | Rectum | + | 5r5e | IF |
2 | 6/5/05 | Farm 1, cow 2 | Rectum | − | 5r5e | IF |
3 | 13/9/05 | Farm 2, cow 1 | Rectum | + | 5r5e | IF |
4 | 13/9/05 | Farm 2, cow 2 | Rectum | + | 5r5e | IF |
5 | 13/9/05 | Farm 2, cow 3 | Rectum | + | 5r5e | IF |
6 | 14/9/05 | Farm 3, cow 1 | Rectum | + | 25r5e | IF |
7 | 14/9/05 | Farm 3, cow 1 | Rumen | + | 25r5e | IF |
8 | 14/9/05 | Farm 3, cow 2 | Rectum | + | 25r5e | IF |
9 | 15/12/05 | Farm 4, cow 1 | Rumen | + | 25r5e | IF |
10 | 15/12/05 | Farm 4, cow 1 | Rectum | + | 25r5e | IF |
11 | 15/12/05 | Farm 4, cow 1 | Cecum | + | 25r5e | IF |
12 | 15/12/05 | Farm 4, cow 1 | Abomasum | + | 25r5e | AC3 |
13 | 15/12/05 | Farm 4, cow 1 | Omasum | + | 25r5e | OC1 |
14 | 15/12/05 | Farm 4, cow 1 | Colon | + | 25r5e | CC2 |
15 | 4/01/06 | Farm 5, cow 1 | Rectum | + | 25r5e | IF |
16 | 4/01/06 | Farm 5, cow 2 | Rectum | + | 25r5e | CHPA |
17 | 15/11/06 | Farm 6, cow 1 | Urine | + | 25r5e | IF |
18 | 15/11/06 | Farm 6, cow 1 | Rectum | + | 25r5e | IF |
19 | 15/11/06 | Farm 6, cow 2 | Urine | + | 25r5e | IF |
20 | 15/11/06 | Farm 6, cow 2 | Rectum | + | 25r5e | IF |
21 | 16/6/09 | Farm 7, bull 1 | Rumen | − | 25r5e | RU1, RU2 |
22 | 16/6/09 | Farm 7, bull 2 | Rectum | − | 25r5e | RE1 |
23 | 16/6/09 | Farm 7, heifer 1 | Rumen | − | 25r5e | IF |
24 | 16/6/09 | Farm 7, heifer 1 | Abomasum | − | 25r5e | IF |
25 | 16/6/09 | Farm 7, heifer 2 | Rectum | − | 25r5e | IF |
26 | 16/6/09 | Farm 7, heifer 2 | Abomasum | − | 25r5e | IF |
27 | 7/10/09 | Farm 8, cow 1 | Rectum | + | 25r5e | IF |
All farms listed were in Cheshire, and all animals tested were Holstein-Friesian cows.
Whether the animal had an active BDD lesion (+) or no lesion present (−).
Antibiotic concentration used in medium and on agar plates. Numbers are micrograms/milliliter. r, rifampin; e, enrofloxacin.
IF, isolation failed.