Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 5;77(1):138–147. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00993-10

TABLE 2.

Comparisons between bovine gastrointestinal and BDD treponemes

Strain Isolation material Nearest relative (% shared identity) Growth condition (days of growth)a Presence of:
Reference
Hemolysis Serum dependence tlyC geneb nifH geneb
OC1 GI tract T. bryantii (90.0) NSSR (2-3) This study
AC3 GI tract T. zioleckii (89.3) NSSR (2-3) + This study
CC2 GI tract T. bryantii (90.0) NSSR (2-3) This study
CHPA GI tract T. bryantii (87.7) NSSR (2-3) This study
RE1 GI tract T. bryantii (90.0) NSSR (2-3) This study
RU1 GI tract T. zioleckii (90.2) NSSR (2-3) + This study
RU2 GI tract T. bryantii (90.0) NSSR (2-3) This study
T19 BDD lesion T. medium (99.6) RS (9) + + + 12
T56 BDD lesion T. medium (99.6) RS (9) + + + 12
T320A BDD lesion T. phagedenis (100) FCS (7) + + 12
T354A BDD lesion T. phagedenis (100) FCS (7) + + 12
T3552B BDD lesion T. denticola (95.7) FCS (4) + + + 12
G819CN BDD lesion T. denticola (95.7) FCS (4) + + + 12
a

The preferred OTEB serum supplement for optimal growth is described (determined by total cell numbers). The number of days for optimal growth is shown in parentheses. NSSR, no serum supplement required.

b

Presence as identified by PCR using genus/eubacterium-specific degenerate primers.