TABLE 5.
Comparison of resistances to selected antibiotics of Minjiang River basin E. coli isolates (this study) with those of E. coli isolates obtained in other studies from surface water, fecal material, retail meat, or clinical specimens
Source of isolate | % of isolates resistant |
Reference | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gentamicin | Streptomycin | Ampicillin | Ciprofloxacin | Norfloxacin | Tetracycline | Chloramphenicol | ||
Minjiang River surface water (n = 200) | 22 | 44 | 73 | 27 | 21 | 69 | 81 | This study |
Animal feces (United States) (n = 1,037) | 0.8 | 13.2 | 5.6 | 28 | 1 | 15 | ||
Livestock waste lagoons (United States) (n = 2,008) | 16 | 39 | 36 | 30 | ||||
Retail meat [(beef; Canada) (n = 572)] | 2 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 20 | 3 | 31 | |
Chicken abattoir (Canada) (n = 170) | 8 | 45 | 38 | 1 | 50 | 4 | 31 | |
Swine on farm (n = 1,425) | 2 | 37 | 38 | 0.1 | 80 | 20 | 31 | |
Seine River downstream of STPa (France) (n = 104) | 5.8 | 9.6 | 43.6 | 38 | 21 | |||
STP effluent (Austria) (n = 767) | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 8 | 34 | |
Clinical isolates (China) (n = 732) | 60 | 65 | 49 | |||||
Wenyu River basin (China) (n = 388) | 0 | 7.9 | 36 | 16 |
STP, sewage treatment plant.